Paragraph
1 5 | Word had absorbed the human nature (hominem); the body of the
2 5 | it was not in true human nature that Christ was born, suffered,
3 6 | before the union the human nature of Christ did not exist
4 6 | that after the union one nature resulted from the coalescence
5 6 | this case] since the divine nature is infinite and unchangeable. ~
6 9 | unification', there was also one nature in Christ. For the sake
7 20| confess that he had only one nature' (St. Leo, Ep. xxviii, 6.
8 20| Flesh is attributed only one nature' (Ibid.). He attacked with
9 20| the weakness of his human nature, not in the divinity itself,
10 21| which arise from his double nature, 'Since the properties of
11 21| Since the properties of each nature remain intact, and they
12 21| 192). And again: 'Each nature possesses its properties
13 22| Whence 'In his actions either nature with the co-operation of
14 24| Upóstasis); the term 'Nature' has a totally different
15 25| expression: 'One Incarnate nature of the Word God'. This expression
16 25| since he used the term 'nature' to signify 'person'. The
17 25| Incarnation. Thus they made 'nature' and 'essence' (essentia)
18 25| the other hand, had made 'nature' the equivalent of' Person'
19 27| We speak of Christ as one nature, not to imply confusion
20 27| Nestorium says, "There is one nature of the Incarnate Word as
21 27| Christ. We say there is one nature referring to the hypostasis,
22 27| our own expression: "One Nature." Nor do we refuse to say "
23 29| With the entire and perfect nature of man' - thus grandly St.
24 29| born, complete in his own nature, complete in ours' (Ep.
25 31| condition of Christ's human nature to such an extent as to
26 33| came down by taking human nature, but the Son of Man ascended
27 33| ascended according to his human nature to the sublimity of eternal
28 44| Let all love our restored nature in him, let them cultivate
29 45| Who is One in Three, whose nature is goodness, whose will
|