Part, Chapter
1 I,5| autonomy of life, especially of governance”; it is true, consequently,
2 I,5| and facilitates collegial governance which, on the other hand,
3 I,5| council that helps her/him in governance as an organism of participation
4 I,5| the council an organism of governance strictly speaking, but rather
5 I,5| rather of collaboration in governance; nor does she consider the
6 I,5| on the point of ordinary governance, AAS64 (1972), 393-394). [[[
7 I,5| promotion of a spiritual governance that needs an openness of
8 I,5| a more spiritual view of governance than that of certain canonists
9 I,5| on the personal nature of governance, defers to the studies of
10 II,1| general topic of “spiritual governance”; and this, in its turn,
11 II,1| understanding of “spiritual governance” it is surely helpful to
12 II,1| discernment, also the Superior’s governance can be seen as an operation
13 II,1| arriving at a decision of governance of the superior, using the
14 II,1| to fulfilling the entire governance process alone. The most
15 II,1| the work of a superior’s governance with the council in light
16 II,1| without falling into collegial governance and even without wanting
17 II,1| substitution of the superior’s governance, actually the council is
18 II,1| into the view of spiritual governance according to the discernment
19 II,1| the decision, the act of governance is invalid. We could say,
20 II,1| not an organ of collegial governance; and, even after having
21 II,1| and statement of personal governance proper to a spiritual governance --,
22 II,1| governance proper to a spiritual governance --, to overturn it.~Ø
23 II,1| re-reading of a superior’s governance and the function of his/
24 II,1| of subjects in ordinary governance between superior and council (
25 II,1| the spiritual nature of governance of both the subjects, and
|