Part, Chapter

 1         I,1|             reflects the founding charism of each Institute. Therefore,
 2         I,1|       dangerous, because the very charism of the Institute can be
 3         I,1|        defending the foundational charism of each Institute; on the
 4         I,1|     either cripple an Institute’s charism and, consequently, the spiritual
 5         I,1|       regarding a duly recognized charism. [If then, the Church authorities
 6         I,1|         Institute required by its charism (cfr. G. GHIRLANDA, “Atto
 7         I,1|  structure, and therefore, on the charism of one’s Institute; or it
 8         I,2| corresponding to each Institute’s charism, the values involved: participation,
 9         I,5|        apostolic life has its own charism which must be jealously
10         I,5|       Institute and depend on its charism. It is true that the Apostolic
11         I,5|          bishop must approve that charism without crushing it and