Part, Chapter
1 Int | relationship between the Superior and his/her Council (seen
2 Int | juridical acts placed by the Superior without consultation of
3 Int | part of the Council, to the superior’s belonging or not-belonging
4 Int | it, to the ability of the superior to settle a question in
5 Int | well in the council, or the superior/authority in respect to
6 Int | its relationship with the Superior’s spiritual government,
7 Int | call the council of the superior, which can have other names (
8 I,1| reference to our issue of the Superior and his/her Council.~We
9 I,1| in general the need of a Superior (to be understood in a broader
10 I,1| a broader sense than the superior in a religious institute,
11 I,2| the election procedure for Superior and Councils; we almost
12 I,2| involved in our topic “The Superior and his/her council”. ~Thus
13 I,2| designing the figure of the superior at all levels, according
14 I,4| of collaboration in the superior’s government [Note: Decree “
15 I,4| pope, bishop pastor and superior at different levels, and
16 I,4| members collaborate with the superior for the animation of the
17 I,5| Council”? what do we mean by “superior”? which are the two terms
18 I,5| questions:~1) Is the superior part of the council? Can
19 I,5| Case~In the 1st Case the superior is not part of the council
20 I,5| rightfully talk about the “superior’s council” or the “superior
21 I,5| superior’s council” or the “superior and his/her council”.~In
22 I,5| the “whole made up of the superior and the councilors” or,~
23 I,5| is expressed saying: “the superior and the councilors together
24 I,5| as distinct from the same superior who asks consent. Concretely,
25 I,5| a vote, but to help the superior in the process of arriving
26 I,5| decision: the will of the superior and the will of the group
27 I,5| reported above, that is if the superior has the right to vote, is
28 I,5| only in the 2nd Case. The superior cannot concur to form the
29 I,5| validly. Besides, that the superior not have right to give a
30 I,5| the right to vote on the superior and consider him/her a member
31 I,5| Constitutions that confer on the Superior the right to vote and consider
32 I,5| every real and canonical superior must have a council that
33 I,5| in such a way that the superior, if there is one, be a mere
34 I,5| personal government of a superior, without reducing that person
35 I,5| very figure and role of the superior, with a consequent vacuum
36 I,5| personal relationship between superior and subject, impossible
37 I,5| giving voting right to the superior, at least to break a tie (
38 II,1| relationship between the superior and her/his council. I will
39 II,1| the relationship between superior and council in light of
40 II,1| of opposition between the superior and the council, without,
41 II,1| the relationship between superior and council is the development
42 II,1| of relationship between superior and council and to take
43 II,1| between the government of the superior and the dynamics of election [
44 II,1| spiritual discernment, also the Superior’s governance can be seen
45 II,1| besides the Holy Spirit, the superior and the subject, also the
46 II,1| decision of governance of the superior, using the outline of “See/
47 II,1| EXPERIENCE~ SECRETARY COUNCIL SUPERIOR PROCURATOR~INFORMATIVE CONSULTATIVE
48 II,1| EXECUTIVE~The energies of the superior, precisely because she/he
49 II,1| that it be reserved to the superior. For other times, both that
50 II,1| the decision (point 4) the superior needs to have help: the
51 II,1| that it is basically the superior who has the competency of
52 II,1| determined, by the intellect. The superior who would want to govern
53 II,1| re-reading of the work of a superior’s governance with the council
54 II,1| relationship between the superior and council and the latter’
55 II,1| which is proper to the superior and which, if it were habitual
56 II,1| government is only in the superior; and if on the superior’
57 II,1| superior; and if on the superior’s part there is a vote,
58 II,1| permit or not permit the superior to act. The council is not
59 II,1| not “worth less” than the superior who has it. Certain expressions
60 II,1| authoritarianism of the superior) with an equally pernicious
61 II,1| error, that of making the superior (=will) a simple executor
62 II,1| council a substitution of the superior’s governance, actually the
63 II,1| of the council that the superior receives as instrument and
64 II,1| is required:~Ø the superior cannot act without having
65 II,1| the figure above that the superior cannot proceed beyond in
66 II,1| decide.~Ø Should the superior obtain the consent he is
67 II,1| bind the decision of the superior, who, in spite of the vote
68 II,1| is required:~Ø The superior, to act in such a way that
69 II,1| specific position), the superior is not even obliged to follow
70 II,1| also the re-reading of a superior’s governance and the function
71 II,1| ordinary governance between superior and council (the superior
72 II,1| superior and council (the superior is not a member of the council)
|