Part, Chapter
1 Int | service of authority and government.~On this subject we find
2 Int | the Superior’s spiritual government, especially as we will see
3 I,1| We must remember that the government structure of an Institute
4 I,1| connected to whatever refers to government structure – reflects the
5 I,1| to touch and change the government structure can turn out to
6 I,1| consideration of the special government structure of the Institute
7 I,1| understood; or on the particular government structure, and therefore,
8 I,2| of studies to renew the government structures of our Institute,
9 I,2| body, there is also human government which, before being a “structure”
10 I,4| democratic or monarchic models of government and fix well in our mind:~
11 I,4| council is not an organ of government understood in the second
12 I,4| collaboration in the superior’s government [Note: Decree “Experimenta”
13 I,4| which a collegial action of government is provided for. The only
14 I,4| deliberating organ as a government organ understood in the
15 I,4| 699); ~2) that the government, in whatever way it is exercised,
16 I,5| manifested in the form of government, and according to Can 586, §
17 I,5| and exclusive collegial government whether for the whole institute,
18 I,5| in mind that “collegial government” is not synonymous with “
19 I,5| synonymous with “chapter government”: also institutes (e.g.,
20 I,5| regime, must have a personal government of a superior, without reducing
21 I,5| situation of a collegial government. Moreover, this collegial
22 I,5| Moreover, this collegial government actually led to legal hardening,
23 I,5| call for a collegial type government as better for religious
24 I,5| sociological situation: a collegial government more easily becomes bureaucratic
25 II,1| discernment. In order for a government decision to be spiritual
26 II,1| relationship between the government of the superior and the
27 II,1| voluntarism which translated into government terms we would call authoritarianism.
28 II,1| of habitually collegial government, he would renounce his freedom
29 II,1| fall into a rationalistic government that would impede the personal
30 II,1| personal dimension of his government, redesigning it not according
31 II,1| the council, a collegial government would follow), but as discernment
32 II,1| discernment and deliberation of government is realized;~2. that,
33 II,1| deliberative power in ordinary government is only in the superior;
34 II,1| ordinary, not extraordinary, government of the institute. We cannot
|