Dialogue

  1 1|             to hear what you have to say.~PHIL. Pray, Hylas, what
  2 1|              hot and heavy, I cannot say, with any truth or propriety,
  3 1|              it.~PHIL. What shall we say then of your external object;
  4 1|          real heat in bodies. I only say, there is no such thing
  5 1|               PHIL. But, did you not say before that all degrees
  6 1|      anything be more absurd than to say, THERE IS NO HEAT IN THE
  7 1|              PHIL. But what will you say, Hylas, if it shall appear
  8 1|              the fire or sugar. What say you to this?~PHIL. I say
  9 1|             say you to this?~PHIL. I say it is nothing to the purpose.
 10 1|          profess it sounds oddly, to say that sugar is not sweet.~
 11 1|            like case before. But, to say no more of that, are you
 12 1|            philosophical paradox, to say that REAL SOUNDS ARE NEVER
 13 1|     microscope. Then’ as to what you say by way of prevention: I
 14 1|             is something in what you say.~PHIL. Besides, it is not
 15 1|       substance.~HYL. That is what I say.~PHIL. Well then, since
 16 1|              mite’s foot; that is to say, by your own principles
 17 1|             a concession.~PHIL. Odd, say you? After the concessions
 18 1|         other proportion: that is to say, according to your principles (
 19 1|               HYL. I have nothing to say to it.~PHIL. Then as for
 20 1|               Philonous, if what you say be true, why those philosophers
 21 1|           They are.~PHIL. That is to say, they are extension in general,
 22 1|             extension.~HYL. But what say you to PURE INTELLECT? May
 23 1|             qualities?~HYL. You need say no more on this head. I
 24 1|        Nothing.~PHIL. What you would say then is that the red and
 25 1|             That is not all; I would say they have a real existence
 26 1|            me whether it be not as I say?~HYL. I acknowledge, Philonous,
 27 1|           declare I know not what to say. I once thought I understood
 28 1|              I did.~PHIL. That is to say, when you conceive the real
 29 1|         after that manner.~PHIL. How say you, Hylas, can you see
 30 1|           PHIL. How then came you to say, you conceived a house or
 31 1|              way off? Is not this, I say, manifest to the senses?~
 32 1|               And these you will not say are without the mind.~HYL.
 33 1|          understand you rightly, you say our ideas do not exist without
 34 1|          unlike the rest? Or, if you say it resembles some one only
 35 1|             loss. I know not what to say to this.~PHIL. But neither
 36 1|              to the mind. That is to say, you are a downright sceptic.
 37 1|             not everything you could say been heard and examined
 38 2|             a great deal in what you say. Nor can any one be more
 39 2|          ideas. When, therefore, you say all ideas are occasioned
 40 2|          made in vain?~HYL. But what say you? Are not you too of
 41 2|       exhibited to me. The things, I say, immediately perceived are
 42 2|               MARK it well; I do not say, I see things by perceiving
 43 2|             do not understand; but I say, the things by me perceived
 44 2|         indeed something in what you say. But I am afraid you do
 45 2|             second place, whether to say something and conceive nothing
 46 2|           ideas?~PHIL. An instrument say you; pray what may be the
 47 2|           have me believe; since you say you have no manner of notion
 48 2|             to part with it? But, to say no more of this (though
 49 2|               Those things which you say are present to God, without
 50 2|         already offered all I had to say on those heads. I am at
 51 2|            points. I have no more to say to them. But, to prevent
 52 2|              entangled me; for, if I say it exists in place, then
 53 2|               perhaps you will still say, Matter may exist; though
 54 3|             speculation.~PHIL. What! Say you we can know nothing,
 55 3|            me, Hylas, is it not as I say?~HYL. I agree with you.
 56 3|              so fast, Philonous: you say you cannot conceive how
 57 3|               acts, and perceives. I say INDIVISIBLE, because unextended;
 58 3|             them. I do not therefore say my soul is an idea, or like
 59 3|          that of the DEITY.~HYL. You say your own soul supplies you
 60 3|        Matter or reject Spirit. What say you to this?~PHIL. I say,
 61 3|             say you to this?~PHIL. I say, in the first place, that
 62 3|      included in their definition. I say, secondly, that, although
 63 3|               it is no repugnancy to say that a perceiving thing
 64 3|         rational belief of Matter. I say, lastly, that I have a notion
 65 3|         cannot surely be shocking to say, the real tree, existing
 66 3|             Is this as strange as to say, the sensible qualities
 67 3|       infinitely more extravagant to say—a thing which is inert operates
 68 3|            part of the world, I dare say, mean no more)—then I am
 69 3|            are so fond of.~HYL. What say you to this? Since, according
 70 3|               and must needs own you say things plausible enough.
 71 3|            there must be (I will not say archetypes, but) Powers
 72 3|          notion of meaning in what I say: but I have no notion of
 73 3|             suffers pain: that is to say, there is an imperfection
 74 3|        chained to a body: that is to say, our perceptions are connected
 75 3|          imperfection. The former, I say, agrees to God, but not
 76 3|             never understand. This I say, though we had some positive
 77 3|            things into ideas? You, I say, who are not ashamed to
 78 3|          your senses, I do.~HYL. You say you believe your senses;
 79 3|              from thence? You cannot say that sensible objects exist
 80 3|          this the SAME, and I should say it was not the SAME house.—
 81 3|            in a sound? If you should say, We differed in our notions;
 82 3|           sure you yourself will not say it is less intelligible.~
 83 3|              sensations. A cherry, I say, is nothing but a congeries
 84 3|             HYL. But, what would you say, Philonous, if I should
 85 3|            shall hear what I have to say to them.~HYL. Is the mind
 86 3|           without doubt.~HYL. Do you say the things you perceive
 87 3|             all solidity? You cannot say objects are in your mind,
 88 3|       hypothetical being: that is to say, upon supposition there
 89 3|           PHIL. In answer to that, I say, first, created beings might
 90 3|              in being, before man. I say farther, in case we conceive
 91 3|            to their great Creator. I say, moreover, that, in this
 92 3|            annexed to them. But what say you to this? Do you not
 93 3| unintelligible? I am sure you cannot say it is for the glory of God.
 94 3|             things perceptible, what say you, Philonous? Is it not
 95 3|        confess it seems to be as you say.~PHIL. As a balance, therefore,
 96 3|           immediate evidence? When I say the being of a God, I do
 97 3|              Matter led men into! To say nothing of the numberless
 98 3|          other? what difficulties, I say, and endless disquisitions,
 99 3|             PRINCIPII. One is apt to say—The unknown substances ought
100 3|              by the mind. Remember I say, that it is not any object
101 3|              how to part with it: to say, there is no MATTER in the
102 3|           shocking to me. Whereas to say—There is no MATTER, if by