Dialogue

 1 1|        one simple or uncompounded idea, it follows that this same
 2 1|     follows that this same simple idea is both the intense heat
 3 1|          you frame to yourself an idea of sensible pain or pleasure
 4 1|  abstracted from every particular idea of heat, cold, tastes, smells? &
 5 1|        the senses, think you, the idea of motion belongs? to the
 6 1|         NEVER HEARD, and that the idea of them is obtained by some
 7 1|          If it be allowed that no idea, nor anything like an idea,
 8 1|        idea, nor anything like an idea, can exist in an unperceiving
 9 1|           or imagine, or have any idea of, can be really inherent
10 1|        able to frame this or that idea. Now I am content to put
11 1|      thoughts a distinct ABSTRACT IDEA of motion or extension,
12 1|         by itself, I can form the idea of it in my mind exclusive
13 1|         possible such an abstract idea of extension, without any
14 1|          try if you can frame the idea of any figure, abstracted
15 1|          the senses,—that is, any idea, or combination of ideas—
16 1|           reason you obtained the idea of it?~HYL. I do not pretend
17 1|    pretend to any proper positive IDEA of it. However, I conclude
18 1|          extension? or is not the idea of extension necessarily
19 1|         It seems then you have no idea at all, neither relative
20 1|   conceive in my own thoughts the idea of a tree, or a house, or
21 1|            PHIL. By no means. The idea or thing which you immediately
22 1|       immediately perceived is an idea: and can any idea exist
23 1|           is an idea: and can any idea exist out of the mind?~HYL.
24 1|   anything be like a sensation or idea, but another sensation or
25 1|          but another sensation or idea?~HYL. I must own, I think
26 1|         know can be no part of my idea.~PHIL. Consider, therefore,
27 1|    understand how anything but an idea can be like an idea. And
28 1|        but an idea can be like an idea. And it is most evident
29 1|           is most evident that NO IDEA CAN EXIST WITHOUT THE MIND.~
30 2|    reasonable to suppose that one idea or thing existing in the
31 2|        the origin of that primary idea or brain itself?~HYL. I
32 2|         by some alterations in an idea, whether sensible or imaginable
33 2|          of ideas imprinted in an idea causing that same idea,
34 2|         an idea causing that same idea, which is absurd. If you
35 2|         beside ideas; and that no idea or archetype of an idea
36 2|           idea or archetype of an idea can exist otherwise than
37 2|         my own ideas, and that no idea can exist unless it be in
38 2|         you will. But how can any idea or sensation exist in, or
39 2|        how it should produce’ any idea in our minds. And, I do
40 2|          but the general abstract idea of ENTITY.~HYL. Nothing
41 2|         super-add to this general idea the negation of all those
42 2|          you can frame a distinct idea of Entity in general, prescinded
43 2|        perceived, from Spirit and idea: lastly, where there is
44 2|          most inadequate or faint idea pretended to—I will not
45 2| confession, there was included no idea at all, no sense except
46 3|           you have such a certain idea or appearance in your own
47 3|           acknowledge it.~HYL. No idea therefore can be like unto,
48 3|       Since therefore you have no IDEA of the mind of God, how
49 3|         of God, without having an idea of it, why may not I be
50 3|         notwithstanding I have no idea of it?~PHIL. As to your
51 3|          I own I have properly no IDEA, either of God or any other
52 3|       wills, is plainly itself no idea, nor like an idea. Ideas
53 3|       itself no idea, nor like an idea. Ideas are things inactive,
54 3|       therefore say my soul is an idea, or like an idea. However,
55 3|       soul is an idea, or like an idea. However, taking the word
56 3|          However, taking the word IDEA in a large sense, my soul
57 3|        said to furnish me with an idea, that is, an image or likeness
58 3|            though not an inactive idea, yet in MYSELF some sort
59 3|           do an inactive being or idea; nor know it, as you do
60 3|          you with some sort of an idea or image of God. But, at
61 3|       have, properly speaking, no IDEA of your own soul. You even
62 3|       ideas. Consequently that no idea can be like a spirit. We
63 3|      spirit. We have therefore no idea of any spirit. You admit
64 3|   Substance, although you have no idea of it; while you deny there
65 3|     because you have no notion or idea of it. Is this fair dealing?
66 3|          man hath or can have any idea or notion whatsoever. But
67 3|        not, strictly speaking, an idea of it. I do not perceive
68 3|          do not perceive it as an idea, or by means of an idea,
69 3|           idea, or by means of an idea, but know it by reflexion.~
70 3|        what is perceivable but an idea? And can an idea exist without
71 3|           but an idea? And can an idea exist without being actually
72 3|       oddly.~PHIL. I own the word IDEA, not being commonly used
73 3|         power to raise in you the idea of extension.~PHIL. It is
74 3|         the production of any one idea in our minds by the help
75 3|           cannot conceive how any idea, or anything like an idea,
76 3|         idea, or anything like an idea, should have an absolute
77 3|          It is.~HYL. But the SAME idea which is in my mind cannot
78 3|       thing; or the same thing or idea exist in different minds.
79 3|           you super-added to your idea of the house the simple
80 3|       house the simple abstracted idea of identity, whereas I did
81 3|        you mean by THE ABSTRACTED IDEA OF IDENTITY; and should