Dialogue

 1 1|        happened well, to let you see what innocent and agreeable
 2 1|         when men of less leisure see them who are supposed to
 3 1|           but, if I were made to see anything absurd or sceptical
 4 1|         from this, that though I see one part of the sky red,
 5 1|        them, which I now plainly see. And it is this: because
 6 1|           Hold, Philonous, I now see what it was delude time.
 7 1|         without the mind?~HYL. I see it is to no purpose to hold
 8 1|         in the air, yet I do not see how you can infer from thence,
 9 1|          ACUTE, or GRAVE.~HYL. I see you are resolved not to
10 1|          be plainer than that we see them on the objects?~PHIL.
11 1|        hath that colour which we see in it.~PHIL. How! is there
12 1|        HATH THAT COLOUR WHICH WE SEE IN IT, you make visible
13 1|        the same colours which we see exist in external bodies,
14 1|      beautiful red and purple we see on yonder clouds really
15 1|          that all the colours we see with our naked eyes are
16 1|          blind? Or, in case they see, can it be imagined their
17 1|         it not evident they must see particles less than their
18 1|        different humours, do not see the same colours in every
19 1|        THE RED AND BLUE WHICH WE SEE ARE NOT REAL COLOURS, BUT
20 1|     WHICH NO MAN EVER DID OR CAN SEE ARE TRULY SO. Are not these
21 1|         and extension which they see and feel?~HYL. Without doubt,
22 1|    therefore must be supposed to see his own foot, and things
23 1|          to give up EXTENSION, I see so many odd consequences
24 1|         of? Is it that which you see?~HYL. The same.~PHIL. And
25 1|      same.~PHIL. And what do you see beside colour, figure, and
26 1|      really in the tulip which I see is manifest. Neither can
27 1|      since you do not pretend to SEE that unthinking substance.~
28 1|        from the subject.~PHIL. I see you have no mind to be pressed
29 1|          say you, Hylas, can you see a thing which is at the
30 1|      where no one was present to see it, methought that was to
31 1|         while. But now I plainly see that all I can do is to
32 1|          me. Is it not certain I SEE THINGS at a distance? Do
33 1|          was on a sudden made to see, he could at first have
34 1|         of Julius Caesar, do you see with your eyes any more
35 1|        anything of Julius Caesar see as much?~HYL. He would.~
36 1|     likewise when we are said to see a red-hot bar of iron; the
37 1|         any one that did.~HYL. I see, Philonous, you are disposed
38 1|          at present so amazed to see myself ensnared, and as
39 2|   hypothesis.~HYL. I now clearly see it was a mere dream. There
40 2|     leave it to a man himself to see if he can conceive, even
41 2|       you too of opinion that we see all things in God? If I
42 2|          our being.” But that we see things in His essence, after
43 2|         it well; I do not say, I see things by perceiving that
44 2|      existence of anything, if I see no reason for believing
45 2|      unknown thing.~HYL. When we see ideas produced in our minds,
46 2|  existence of this GLOVE, that I see it, and feel it, and wear
47 2|          thing, which I actually see in this place, by supposing
48 2|         which I never did or can see, exists after an unknown
49 2|          is impossible; nor do I see what more can be said in
50 3|       stand on, and that which I see before my eyes to be a real
51 3|      nothing in them like what I see and feel.~HYL. Even so.~
52 3|          are those very things I see, and feel, and perceive
53 3|         those words the things I see and feel, am obliged to
54 3|          those things I actually see and feel.~HYL. Not so fast,
55 3| probability for the other; if we see signs and effects indicating
56 3|       agents like ourselves, and see no sign or symptom whatever
57 3|      real natures—though we both see and feel them, and perceive
58 3|       Spirit. From the effects I see produced, I conclude there
59 3|  difference, makes you fancy you see an absurdity where there
60 3|      demonstration?~PHIL. Let me see how you demonstrate that
61 3|       speaking, Hylas, we do not see the same object that we
62 3|        part. I would much rather see how you can get over what
63 3|        more here, they would all see the garden, the trees, and
64 3|         trees, and flowers, as I see them. But they are not in
65 3|      principles, that no two can see the same thing? And is not
66 3|           therefore, that no two see the same thing, makes equally
67 3|          are sure that we really see, hear, feel; in a word,
68 3|         concerned any farther? I see this cherry, I feel it,
69 3|      softness, &c. Hence, when I see, and feel, and taste, in
70 3|         SUBSTRATUM?~PHIL. When I see your reasons, you shall
71 3|          all, I confess I do not see what use can be made of
72 3|       the mind.~HYL. Pray let me see any sense you can understand
73 3|       reconciled to them.~HYL. I see you can assault me with
74 3|       more than the advantages I see it is attended with. I am
75 3|   imagine you deny the things we see and feel: but, upon reflexion,
76 3|         clearly convinced that I see things in their native forms,
77 3|    opposite to theirs.~PHIL. You see, Hylas, the water of yonder