Dialogue

 1 1|         exist in an unperceiving corporeal substance. But this is no
 2 1|          wormwood are unthinking corporeal substances existing without
 3 1|         speak of are, I suppose, corporeal Substances existing without
 4 1|          do.~PHIL. Pray, is your corporeal substance either a sensible
 5 1|       make visible objects to be corporeal substances; which implies
 6 1|        which implies either that corporeal substances are sensible
 7 1|     clear consequence, that your CORPOREAL SUBSTANCE is nothing distinct
 8 1| unwilling to have your notion of corporeal substance examined, I shall
 9 1|        by LIGHT you understand a corporeal substance external to the
10 1|         in general, exist in any corporeal substance?~HYL. I will take
11 1|        PHIL. Consequently, every corporeal substance, being the SUBSTRATUM
12 1|    possibly conceive how any one corporeal sensible thing should exist
13 2|      though they acknowledge all corporeal beings to be perceived by
14 2|    exclusive of all thinking and corporeal beings, all particular things
15 3|        all other real things, or corporeal substances, which compose
16 3|      with regard to every, other corporeal thing. And, what is more,
17 3|        it is impossible any REAL corporeal thing should exist in nature.~
18 3|       such things as physical or corporeal causes; but that a Spirit
19 3|    denying Matter, Philonous, or corporeal Substance; there is the
20 3|         that there are bodies or corporeal substances (meaning the
21 3|   perceptions are connected with corporeal motions. By the law of our
22 3|     connexion of sensations with corporeal motions means no more than
23 3|    sympathy, or natural ties. No corporeal motions are attended with
24 3|         an essential part of all corporeal things. We both, therefore,
25 3|    things, of real things, solid corporeal substances. Bring your principles
26 3|         before. But as for solid corporeal substances, I desire you
27 3|         and conceivable that the corporeal world should have an absolute
28 3|       against a creation? That a corporeal substance, which hath an
29 3|          laying aside Matter and corporeal, causes, and admitting only
30 3|  argument against the reality of corporeal things, or in behalf of
31 3|        the ABSOLUTE existence of corporeal things. Nor is this all;