Dialogue

 1 1|         entered into the mind of man, to wit, that there is no
 2 1|           but every false step a man makes in discourse is not
 3 1|       sufficient to denominate a man a SCEPTIC?~PHIL. Shall we
 4 1|         that necessarily leads a man into an absurdity?~HYL.
 5 1|        mind, or no?~HYL. Can any man in his senses doubt whether
 6 1|       food; since that which one man delights in, another abhors.
 7 1|     MOTIONS AND FIGURES WHICH NO MAN EVER DID OR CAN SEE ARE
 8 1|       plain that if we suppose a man born blind was on a sudden
 9 1|      else.~PHIL. And would not a man who had never known anything
10 2|         satisfied any reasonable man. What connexion is there
11 2|         issue, and leave it to a man himself to see if he can
12 2|         in language. And for any man to affect speaking improperly
13 2|      philosopher, or even like a man of common sense, to pretend
14 2|      that it were absurd for any man to argue against the existence
15 2|       all one way or other, to a man who takes the liberty to
16 3|         is impossible you or any man alive should know it. All
17 3|          and paper, like another man; and do you not know what
18 3|  deplorable scepticism that ever man was. Tell me, Hylas, is
19 3|          neither I nor any other man hath or can have any idea
20 3|      between them? Ask the first man you meet, and he shall tell
21 3|          their senses, how can a man be mistaken in thinking
22 3|         together; and the more a man knows of the connexion of
23 3| creatures should precede that of man? And is not this directly
24 3|         spirits in being, before man. I say farther, in case
25 3|         to be expected, that any man, whether Materialist or
26 3|         by all that, would not a man think you were assured there
27 3|       your notions.~PHIL. When a man is swayed, he knows not