Dialogue

 1 1|        added, or who denies the reality and truth of things.~PHIL.
 2 1|        us it is that denies the reality of sensible things, or professes
 3 1|       Certainly.~PHIL. Doth the REALITY of sensible things consist
 4 1| existence than we can be of the reality of a lesser degree.~PHIL.
 5 1|  qualities enough to secure the reality of external things.~PHIL.
 6 1|       supposed to derogate, the reality of Matter, or external objects;
 7 1|  principles, forced to deny the REALITY of sensible things; since
 8 2|        delightful scenes of all REALITY? How should those Principles
 9 2| Scepticism. You indeed said the REALITY of sensible things consisted
10 2|      pursuant to this notion of reality, YOU are obliged to deny
11 2|    neither said nor thought the reality of sensible things was to
12 2|     thence conclude against the reality of any notion, or existence
13 2|        account for it.~HYL. THE REALITY of things cannot be maintained
14 2|       in its defence?~PHIL. The reality of things! What things?
15 2|        should be assured of the reality of this thing, which I actually
16 2|       all? How can the supposed reality of that which is intangible
17 3|      distinguishing between the reality and sensible appearances
18 3|       wherein you suppose their reality consists. And, as you are
19 3| misapprehension that I deny the reality of sensible things. But,
20 3|        to you, men judge of the reality of things by their senses,
21 3|         exists, or is real; its reality being in my opinion nothing
22 3|       the sense, the truth, and reality of things continues the
23 3|        one argument against the reality of corporeal things, or
24 3|    which doth not suppose their reality to consist in an external
25 3|        originals, but place the reality of things in ideas, fleeting