Dialogue

 1 1|       extravagant things in the world. This however might be borne,
 2 1|       MATERIAL SUBSTANCE in the world.~PHIL. That there is no
 3 1|        the general sense of the world. But, can you think it no
 4 2|      therefore, as the sensible world really exists, so sure is
 5 2|       EXISTENCE OF THE SENSIBLE WORLD, is an advantage to them
 6 2|    reflexion: that the sensible world is that which we perceive
 7 2|       shapeless, of the visible world, to exist without a mind?
 8 2| hypothesis, in making a created world exist otherwise than in
 9 2|     that it makes that material world serve to no purpose. And,
10 2|        which supposes the whole world made in vain?~HYL. But what
11 2|    asserts an absolute external world, which I deny. He maintains
12 2|      there was no Matter in the world; neither can I conceive,
13 3|        that single thing in the world whereof we can know the
14 3|   substances, which compose the world. They have none of them
15 3|        it not strange the whole world should be thus imposed on,
16 3|        know nothing real in the world? Suppose you are going to
17 3|         the common sense of the world for the truth of my notion.
18 3|         there is nothing in the world but spirits and ideas. And
19 3|     unphilosophical part of the world, I dare say, mean no more)—
20 3|       inexplicable thing in the world. And yet, for all this,
21 3|    would have induced the whole world to believe the being of
22 3|        the several parts of the world became gradually perceivable
23 3|  conceivable that the corporeal world should have an absolute
24 3|       there is no MATTER in the world, is still shocking to me.