Dialogue

 1 1|    reason doth thence evidently conclude there must be some cause
 2 1|  thinking substance; may we not conclude that external bodies are
 3 1|          by your principles, to conclude it is really both cold and
 4 1|  objects. We must not therefore conclude absolutely, that there is
 5 1|      PHIL. May we not therefore conclude of smells, as of the other
 6 1|          HYL. And what will you conclude from all this? You cannot
 7 1|      the very same reasoning to conclude, there is no extension or
 8 1| positive IDEA of it. However, I conclude it exists, because qualities
 9 1|     PHIL. But you do not thence conclude the apparitions in a dream
10 1|      You ought not therefore to conclude that sensible objects are
11 1|          PHIL. How can you then conclude from sight that figures
12 2|        mind or spirit. Whence I conclude, not that they have no real
13 2|     immediately and necessarily conclude the being of a God, because
14 2|        THINGS. From all which I conclude, THERE IS A MIND WHICH AFFECTS
15 2|          and manner of these, I conclude THE AUTHOR OF THEM TO BE
16 2|        I will not indeed thence conclude against the reality of any
17 3|        wisely as he that should conclude two men were of a different
18 3|         right. But if he thence conclude that upon taking the oar
19 3|        like manner, if he shall conclude from what he perceives in
20 3|        were erroneous thence to conclude, that, in case we were placed
21 3|       effects I see produced, I conclude there are actions; and,