Dialogue

 1 1|      deny it.~PHIL. And is any unperceiving thing capable of pain or
 2 1|    heat can really exist in an unperceiving corporeal substance. But
 3 1|     you granted before that no unperceiving being was capable of pleasure,
 4 1|   exist without the mind in an unperceiving substance, or body.~HYL.
 5 1|        they should exist in an unperceiving thing?~HYL. I cannot.~PHIL.
 6 1|       an idea, can exist in an unperceiving substance, then surely it
 7 1|       or pleasure can be in an unperceiving substance, men are more
 8 1|  action in it, may exist in an unperceiving substance? And is not this
 9 1|     please, should exist in an unperceiving substance? In short, do
10 1|   sensation should exist in an unperceiving substance. But then, on
11 2|      qualities can exist in an unperceiving substance.~PHIL. But what
12 3| certain external, unperceived, unperceiving substances, are in the right
13 3| passions, infer an unthinking, unperceiving, inactive Substance—either
14 3|        when it is said that an unperceiving substance hath inherent
15 3|      on the mind, and which is unperceiving is the cause of our perceptions,
16 3|       OR EXTERNAL EXISTENCE OF UNPERCEIVING SUBSTANCES? Lastly, Whether,
17 3|       to make your tenet of an unperceiving material SUBSTRATUM intelligible,
18 3|       Matter an unintelligent, unperceiving being. If they demonstrate