Dialogue

 1 1|        are unthinking corporeal substances existing without the mind,
 2 1|       are, I suppose, corporeal Substances existing without the mind?~
 3 1|         objects to be corporeal substances; which implies either that
 4 1|   implies either that corporeal substances are sensible qualities,
 5 1| inherent in external unthinking substances?~HYL. I am.~PHIL. But what
 6 1|        not really inhere in the substances themselves; yet nothing
 7 3|       real things, or corporeal substances, which compose the world.
 8 3|       unperceived, unperceiving substances, are in the right to deny
 9 3|         on a foot with material substances: if to suppose the one be
10 3|         are bodies or corporeal substances (meaning the things I perceive
11 3| absolutely existing unperceived substances, as their originals, be
12 3|       EXISTENCE OF UNPERCEIVING SUBSTANCES? Lastly, Whether, the premises
13 3|        about unknown natures or substances, admit with the vulgar those
14 3|         things, solid corporeal substances. Bring your principles to
15 3|      But as for solid corporeal substances, I desire you to show where
16 3|      manner how two independent substances so widely different as SPIRIT
17 3|       is apt to say—The unknown substances ought to be esteemed real
18 3|         there are such external substances? And to suppose this, is