Dialogue

 1 1|         who make the distinction term SECONDARY?~HYL. What! is
 2 1|    sufficiently expressed in the term SUBSTRATUM, or SUBSTANCE?~
 3 1|          relation implied in the term SUBSTANCE. Is it not that
 4 2|         legs, meaning men by the term TREES. Would you think this
 5 2|   signification of the principal term)—I would fain know what
 6 2|         is only one sense of the term MATTER.~PHIL. But is it
 7 2|          common acceptation of a term.~PHIL. But this now mentioned
 8 3| understood to be implied by that term; and it is now commonly
 9 3|     highly, absurd?~PHIL. If the term SAME be taken in the vulgar
10 3|     truth of things. But, if the term SAME be used in the acceptation
11 3|         persons may yet have the term SAME applied to it? Or,
12 3|         of that general confused term.~HYL. Well but, Philonous,
13 3|        so long accustomed to the term MATTER that I know not how
14 3|         is no MATTER, if by that term be meant an unthinking substance