Dialogue

 1 1|     something oddly; but common language, you know, is framed by,
 2 2|         to a common name in any language? For example, suppose a
 3 2|        standard of propriety in language. And for any man to affect
 4 3|         is so much the constant language of Scripture that it were
 5 3|   contrary to the common use of language?~HYL. Well then, let it
 6 3| confusion of names would render language impracticable. Therefore,
 7 3|        understanding the common language of men, speaking of several
 8 3|        either from propriety of language, or the truth of things.
 9 3|      yet never known the use of language; they would, without question,
10 3|         guilty of some abuse of language in this?~PHIL. None at all.
11 3|         you know is the rule of language, hath authorised: nothing
12 3|       to the general analogy of language; most part of the mental