Chapter

 1 I  |                   I. Preliminary examination ~Art. 3. The indicated writings
 2 I  |        which submits them to the examination of the Congresso [the weekly
 3 II |           5. The outcome of this examination is then presented to the
 4 II |      authorities, or whether the examination needs to proceed further
 5 II | established procedures: ordinary examination or examination in cases
 6 II |          ordinary examination or examination in cases of urgency7. ~Art.
 7 III|       III. Ordinary procedure of examination ~Art. 8. An ordinary examination
 8 III| examination ~Art. 8. An ordinary examination is used when a writing appears
 9 III|          particular urgency. The examination is structured in two phases:
10 III|      information relevant to the examination of the case (including the
11 III|        content of the text under examination. The relator pro auctore
12 III|       vote on the outcome of the examination, aimed at determining whether
13 III|  Consultors, is submitted to the examination of the Sessione Ordinaria
14 III|         has taken place. If this examination reveals truly new doctrinal
15 III|      what way the results of the examination are to be made public. ~
16 IV |                              IV. Examination in cases of urgency ~Art.
17 IV |      urgency ~Art. 23. An urgent examination is employed when the writing
18 IV |        will give priority to the examination of the question. ~Art. 26.