bold = Main text
   Chapter  grey = Comment text

 1    I(23)|                           So Oehler gives in his text. But his
 2   II(29)| eu0xaristei=a (Fr. Junius in Oehler): perhaps "the place in
 3   II(32)|                       Seque" Oehler reads here, which appears
 4  III(51)|  from Jerome's Indiculus (in Oehler) shows, "because in so far
 5   IV(53)|                              Oehler separates "in primis;" but
 6   IV(59)|  meaning of this sentence as Oehler gives it. But the text is
 7   IV(61)|                              Oehler's suggestion is to vary
 8    V(65)|      Christum decendisse. So Oehler, who does not notice any
 9    V(65)|  would seem to have held, if Oehler's be the true reading. But
10    V(67)|      secum numerum DCCCI. So Oehler, after Jos. Scaliger, who,
11   VI(72)|              Rig., with whom Oehler agrees, reminds us that
12   VI(78)|                 Phaneroseis. Oehler refers to de Proescr. c.
13 VIII(89)|     Who he is, no one knows. Oehler (following the lead of Fabricius
14 VIII(89)|      ingenious conjecture of Oehler, that these two names, the