Part, Paragraph
1 Pre | necessary even when the author is disposed to correct his
2 Pre | official Contestatio to the author, through Father Joseph William
3 Pre | with satisfaction that the author had shown himself willing
4 Pre | principles recognized by the author, his commitment to revise
5 Pre | above-mentioned meeting with the author took place on June 2, 2000.
6 Pre | judgment on the person of the author, on his intentions, on the
7 Pre | formation according to the author’s theological perspective
8 Note, 1| integrity of argumentation. ~The author states that his text is
9 Note, 1| revelation and by faith”.12 ~The author expresses more than once
10 Note, 1| dimension”.16 Although the author occasionally states that “
11 Note, 1| are filtered through the author’s frequent “options” and “
12 Note, 1| matters of morality.22 The author, while informing his readers
13 Note, 1| the position taken by the author. On a practical level, he
14 Note, 2| Specific Questions~The author maintains that contraceptive
15 Note, 2| recourse to other means”.25 The author applies this same standard
16 Note, 2| teaching of the Church.27~The author holds that the doctrine
17 Note, 2| evaluation of homosexuality, the author adds, one must “adopt a
18 Note, 2| not the issue here. ~The author asserts that the “gravity
19 Note, 2| responsible parenthood, the author states that none of the
20 Note, 2| criteria presented by the author to guide this discernment,43
21 Note, 2| vitro fertilization, the author distances himself from the
22 Note, 2| and on abortion. The author rightly affirms the overall
23 Note, 2| abortion legislation, the author correctly asserts that abortion
24 Note, 2| contrary to ethics”.55 The author seems to be referring to
25 Note, 2| Since the context of the author’s statement is not sufficiently
26 Note, 2| steps already taken by the author and his willingness to follow
|