Book

  1 1|             their soul and by their nature, and plants by their nature
  2 1|         nature, and plants by their nature alone,and that growth and
  3 1|        nutrition are the effects of nature, not of soul.~ ~2. Thus
  4 1|     demonstration of the effects of nature.~ ~When, therefore, such
  5 1|        character of the facultiesof Nature, and what is the effect
  6 1|            activity as an effect of Nature - for example, digestion,
  7 1|          thus flesh is an effect of Nature, butit is, of course, not
  8 1|          cause.~ ~5. The effects of Nature, then, while the animal
  9 1|            not a simple activity of Nature, but is compounded ofalteration
 10 1|  observation of dissections. ~ ~Now Nature constructs bone, cartilage,
 11 1|        specialalterative faculty of Nature; while the bringing of these
 12 1|            big in the same way that Nature does.As it is, however,
 13 1|        however, they cannot do what Nature does, for to imitatethis
 14 1|          soever;it is a property of Nature alone. ~ ~It will now, therefore,
 15 1|         whose growth is directed by Nature; for thosewhich are distended
 16 1|        inthe three dimensions. Thus Nature alone has the power to expand
 17 1|        since the three faculties of Nature have been exhaustivelydealt
 18 1|   expositionof all the faculties of Nature. If, however, one considers
 19 1|             to becomeflesh; for, if Nature thicken it to such an extent
 20 1|              A second reason is the nature of the superfluities.For,
 21 1|          entirely utilisable blood. Nature, therefore,had need of a
 22 1|           abundance of organs which Nature hascreated for the purpose
 23 1|           with all the faculties of Nature,you will have consider each
 24 1|          begin with those effectsof Nature, together with their corresponding
 25 1|            the peoplewho think that Nature is not artistic, that she
 26 1|     definitepronouncement regarding Nature. I speak, of course, of
 27 1|          faculty peculiar either to Nature or toSoul, but that these
 28 1|        teaching, on the other hand, Nature is not posterior to the
 29 1|        thereforein their view it is Nature which puts together the
 30 1|           way,- instead of admiring Nature's artistic skill - they
 31 1|           things, have been made by Nature for no purpose!And some
 32 1|         forethought and art shownby Nature in relation to animals. ~ ~
 33 1|          the firstto recognize what Nature effects, expresses his admiration
 34 1|             fact, hewas ignorant of Nature's faculties, both that attracting
 35 1|           and should have said that Nature is a constructive artist
 36 1|        allow that this constructive Nature has powers which attract
 37 1|           or critical day, and that Nature doesabsolutely nothing for
 38 1|           by people who donot allow Nature a faculty of her own. ~ ~
 39 1|        things which are governed by Nature, a person who attemptedto
 40 2|           it to the rest. Certainly Nature did not give a power such
 41 2|  Erasistratus himself supposed that Nature took thought for the animals'
 42 2|         incompatible. For how could Nature be still looked on as exercising
 43 2|             inborn faculty given by Nature to each one of the organs
 44 2|          truly placed and shaped by Nature). ~ But let us suppose he
 45 2|           to his own statement that Nature is "artistic"- this Nature
 46 2|          Nature is "artistic"- this Nature which, at the beginning,
 47 2|         absurd hypothesis. For this Nature which shapes and gradually
 48 2|            is not so, however, with Nature. Every part of a bone she
 49 2|           and artificial shape. But Nature does not preserve the original
 50 2|        would doubtless say, "Either Nature or the semen," meaning the
 51 2|       becomes, so to say, a special nature. For in the same way that
 52 2|           and would not turn into a nature. Therefore, in order that
 53 2|            perish, but may become a nature in place of semen, there
 54 2|          making neither semen nor a nature, but an actual living animal.
 55 2|            his work "On the Child's Nature." ~ But if each of the parts
 56 2|         sings the artistic skill of Nature! He imagines that animals
 57 2|            in so far as he acclaims Nature as being an artist in construction,
 58 2|             in their teaching about Nature, there could be nothing
 59 2|          accurate acquaintance with Nature, and according to the second,
 60 2|               namely, the view that Nature does everything for some
 61 2|             an authority he was on "Nature," and that those of the
 62 2|      arteries, like a rope woven by Nature out of three different strands.
 63 2|           again, then, we must call Nature "inartistic"; for this necessarily
 64 2|           destroys the principle of Nature's artistic skill. For, if
 65 2|        shall most assuredly deprive Nature of her artistic skill, as
 66 2|     according to such a hypothesis, Nature does not precede, but is
 67 2|       suppose that the faculties of Nature, by which she shapes the
 68 2|         therefore forced to declare Nature devoid of art. It is not
 69 2|            and that, while assuming Nature to be artistically creative,
 70 2|      suitable for a man who assumes Nature to be a skilled artist;
 71 2|      blacker, in others more of the nature of phlegm. And one who realizes
 72 2|      especially if they are warm by nature and are leading a life of
 73 2|          those animals which are by nature warmest have abundance of
 74 2|      articles of food, which are by nature warmer are more productive
 75 2|      articles which are not warm by nature, exists naturally in honey;
 76 2|           have honey brought to the nature of blood. Therefore Hippocrates
 77 2|         indications afforded by its nature, and others simply through
 78 2|             are warm either through nature, disease, time of life,
 79 2|            when in his book "On the Nature of Man" he gives the name "
 80 2|        constitutions, and diseases. Nature, they suppose, is not defective
 81 2| Erasistratus whether his "artistic" Nature has not constructed any
 82 2|          not read the book, "On the Nature of Man," any more than any
 83 2|            holding that an artistic Nature would have prepared so large
 84 2|          are no less authorities on Nature than is Erasistratus - say
 85 2|         which everything throughout nature is governed (by the causes
 86 2|            be heavy and more of the nature of earth; of these the one,
 87 2|       decidedly thick and earthy in nature, and has entirely escaped
 88 3|           too, then, the [animal's] nature has need of some other faculty
 89 3|         previous demonstration that Nature is artistic and solicitous
 90 3|             nor without reason that Nature has made the uterus capable
 91 3|          Art [artistic tendency] of Nature - how she has not merely
 92 3|             not depart from its own nature, whilst in inflammation
 93 3|               A wonderful device of Nature's also is this - that, when
 94 3|             is not dependent on the nature of the organ which alters
 95 3|          part in things governed by Nature. But if he was unable to
 96 3|             become of a more fleshy nature in the gullet. Now simple
 97 3|             of their functions. For Nature would never have purposelessly
 98 3|          recognizing the effects of Nature. Come, therefore, let us
 99 3|          others both as regards his nature and his early training.
100 3|          longer feel surprised that Nature should also frequently discharge
101 3|       another either absolutely, by nature, and in all cases, or else
102 3|       particular instance. Thus, by nature and in all men alike, the
103 3|          Frequently also in disease Nature purges the animal through
104 3|           was previously drawn. Now Nature foresaw this necessity,