Book

 1 1|            of Hippocrates, Diocles, Erasistratus, Praxagoras, and all otherphysicians
 2 1|             fool. ~ ~16. Now, while Erasistratus for some reason replied
 3 1|         attracting semen," or ifhe [Erasistratus] had thought proper to write
 4 1|             Therefore, the reply of Erasistratus in histreatise "On Deglutition"
 5 1|             into the kidneys?~ ~Now Erasistratus realized that all these
 6 1|            was for this reason that Erasistratus keptsilence and Asclepiades
 7 1|       theother saying stupidly what Erasistratus had the sense to keep silenceabout. ~ ~
 8 1|             those near the times of Erasistratus maintain that the parts
 9 1|            they drink.And that even Erasistratus was aware of this is known
10 1|   difficulty which was insoluble by Erasistratus and by all others except
11 1|         same way, even according to Erasistratus himself.~ ~This matter,
12 2|          demonstrated that not only Erasistratus, but also all others who
13 2|           true, we must marvel that Erasistratus should make statements concerning
14 2|           even by Asclepiades. Now, Erasistratus considers it absolutely
15 2|             it a demonstration!- of Erasistratus is. ~ And, from another
16 2|    arterioid vein to the lungs (for Erasistratus himself will have it that,
17 2|             is, again, agreeable to Erasistratus himself. ~ 2. Let me draw
18 2|              But, you sapient folk, Erasistratus himself supposed that Nature
19 2|     situation (in which point alone Erasistratus shows some common sense,
20 2|         from it. ~ I would then ask Erasistratus himself to inform me what
21 2|         amount of blood? What would Erasistratus have said if he had been
22 2|             faculty. How, then, was Erasistratus unaware of it, if the primary
23 2|            even this was unknown to Erasistratus - the man who sings the
24 2|            This also was unknown to Erasistratus, whom nothing escaped, if
25 2|             if none of them satisfy Erasistratus, what can the Erasistrateans
26 2|             of none of the ideas of Erasistratus. And, indeed, the disciples
27 2|             than the contentions of Erasistratus. And, I will leave it to
28 2|            according to the second, Erasistratus. It is my task, then, to
29 2|         abandon their reverence for Erasistratus. Very well, then; let them
30 2|             only which is common to Erasistratus and the Peripatetics - namely,
31 2|            only verbal; in practice Erasistratus makes havoc of it a thousand
32 2|             common to Aristotle and Erasistratus, and made up some story
33 2|             of a connection between Erasistratus and these people. That Erasistratus,
34 2| Erasistratus and these people. That Erasistratus, however, has no share in
35 2|            the matter of logic that Erasistratus associated himself with
36 2|            surprise, what possessed Erasistratus that he turned so completely
37 2|       General Principles," in which Erasistratus says, "Since there are two
38 2|       exposition of the teaching of Erasistratus, instead of carrying out
39 2|            in which the argument of Erasistratus becomes involved through
40 2|             one will find that even Erasistratus' reasoning on the subject
41 2|          supply from the veins. But Erasistratus will not have it so. What
42 2|          For, although according to Erasistratus, it contains within itself
43 2|         point, again, I should like Erasistratus himself to answer regarding
44 2|        exist merely in theory; this Erasistratus expressly acknowledges,
45 2|         cares to term it (for, what Erasistratus himself says is, that "there
46 2|        called primary and simple by Erasistratus into other elementary bodies
47 2|           are also at variance with Erasistratus in this matter. That they
48 2|         consonance with the view of Erasistratus, when it declares that what
49 2|             right in supposing that Erasistratus could reach such a pitch
50 2|             their quarrel and to do Erasistratus the honour of placing him
51 2|            I fail to understand how Erasistratus does not perceive that here
52 2|             while listening to what Erasistratus says about these cases in
53 2|          Secondly, I also accept in Erasistratus' statement the expression
54 2|             be arrived at. ~ 8. Now Erasistratus ought not to have been ignorant
55 2|           into useful blood. Why is Erasistratus not ashamed to distinguish
56 2|           terms the carelessness of Erasistratus in omitting a consideration
57 2|         part; this clearly confutes Erasistratus' assumption, although not
58 2|            indurated. ~ The learned Erasistratus, however, overlooks - nay,
59 2|     extraordinary arrogance. ~ Now, Erasistratus is thoroughly small-minded
60 2|           The fact, therefore, that Erasistratus, in regard to other matters,
61 2|         mingled with the food! Thus Erasistratus practically says so in the
62 2|       particularly jaundice - which Erasistratus himself states to occur
63 2|            useless in treatment, as Erasistratus says, to know the actual
64 2|          into bile, but into blood. Erasistratus, however, in addition to
65 2|          ask those who declare that Erasistratus was very familiar with the
66 2|          dryness and moisture. Now, Erasistratus himself confesses this,
67 2|      animals in which, according to Erasistratus, the pneuma, which is propelled
68 2|             faintly and feebly? But Erasistratus himself agrees that human
69 2|             that, even according to Erasistratus' own argument, the cause
70 2|          earth are the followers of Erasistratus going to act, confessing
71 2|            Now, it seems to me that Erasistratus is unaware of this fact
72 2|             the stomach, certainly, Erasistratus held that one should at
73 2|        gladly have been able to ask Erasistratus whether his "artistic" Nature
74 2|         black than yellow bile. Has Erasistratus, then, not read the book, "
75 2|       authorities on Nature than is Erasistratus - say that this viscus also
76 2|           these the high and mighty Erasistratus affected to despise, and
77 2|             entirely passed over by Erasistratus, and he pretended to despise
78 3|            natural condition. ~ Now Erasistratus for some reason declares
79 3|            honey more honey-like! ~ Erasistratus, however, is still more
80 3|         result of these principles. Erasistratus, however, advanced nothing
81 3|           directions. And, although Erasistratus did not attempt to say for
82 3|            be found acknowledged in Erasistratus's own writings that the
83 3|          For what alone happens, as Erasistratus himself said, is that when
84 3|         hindering its action. ~ But Erasistratus said nothing about this,
85 3|             of attracting semen." ~ Erasistratus, however, and Asclepiades
86 3|         this treatise and from what Erasistratus and I myself have demonstrated