Book

 1 1|        As to whether we are to suppose that the substances as well
 2 1|       their water. ~ ~I do not suppose that Asclepiades ever saw
 3 1|        Must we not, therefore, suppose he was either mad, or entirely
 4 1|     Moreover, we must perforce suppose thateach of these small
 5 1|       than extremelyfoolish to suppose that a thorn which we failed
 6 2|       plethora comes about, we suppose the force of compression
 7 2|       Well," say they, "let us suppose that it is not secreted
 8 2|        actually do. For let us suppose they were under no guardianship,
 9 2|        and forethought; let us suppose they were steered only by
10 2| destined to nourish it); if we suppose this, I am sure it would
11 2|       by Nature). ~ But let us suppose he remained true to his
12 2|       this be so, then we must suppose the Peripatetics to have
13 2|       or, if not, then we must suppose that there is, as it were,
14 2|        in this way that we may suppose the veins to be nourished;
15 2|     contrivance, then, does he suppose? He says that a nerve has
16 2|       Thus we must necessarily suppose that the faculties of Nature,
17 2|        extreme carelessness to suppose that the blood is prevented
18 2|       of impairment? Are we to suppose this latter faculty alone
19 2|   evacuated. How, then, if you suppose that no good comes from
20 2|       medicine? ~ Well, let us suppose that it is contained in
21 2|      this be the case, we must suppose blood to be the outcome
22 2|     and diseases. Nature, they suppose, is not defective in this
23 3|    elapsed since their meal. ~ Suppose you fill any animal whatsoever
24 3|       This is as if we were to suppose that it was necessary to
25 3|        shifts to the latter. ~ Suppose we had some food in our
26 3|    divided into three periods. Suppose that in the first period
27 3|        for it is irrational to suppose that one part would draw