Book

 1 1| arguments foolish also. I have shown elsewherethat these opinions
 2 1|        But as has already been shown, these need the service
 3 1|       allowed themselves to be shown the ureterscoming from the
 4 2|    Nature-lore of Aristotle is shown by an enumeration of the
 5 2|  overlooked), it was therefore shown to be necessary that the
 6 2|    regarding nutrition will be shown to be absurd. For in these
 7 2| whereas, as we have previously shown, none of the processes mentioned
 8 2|      elements. For it has been shown that at least in relation
 9 2|     but it has been previously shown that this is not through
10 3|     and nutritive. It was also shown that a sufficient supply
11 3|   epispastic. It has also been shown that assimilation is preceded
12 3|       our argument has clearly shown the necessity for the genesis
13 3|       For, just as it has been shown that these two processes
14 3|        For it has been already shown that the bladder by the
15 3|       the retentive faculty is shown to have its necessary origin:
16 3|      kind? It has already been shown that nothing is altered
17 3|      impossible. Digestion was shown to be nothing else than
18 3|   since the nutriment has been shown to take on in the stomach
19 3| attraction. But the gullet was shown to be pulled down; for otherwise
20 3|       digestion itself we have shown to be a process of alteration. ~
21 3|       four faculties have been shown to be necessary for every
22 3|      analogy. For since it was shown that the gall-bladder attracts
23 3|        however, I think I have shown clearly that there is a
24 3|   nutriment, as I have already shown, it stores up in itself,
25 3|     case of the spleen we have shown in a former passage how
26 3|       And further, it has been shown in other treatises that