Book

 1 1|     not going to enter into an argument withthese people, and it
 2 1|       hypotheses, must, if the argument be in answer to Asclepiades,
 3 1|  understanding the steps of an argument.... In the old days such
 4 1|      shall we also furnish our argument with the illustration affordedby
 5 1|         without any attempt at argument,their words are really thereby
 6 2|       here, again, there is no argument which will demonstrate that
 7 2|        Now, let us reverse our argument and put it in a different
 8 2|     judge by the Erasistratean argument, there must be countless
 9 2|         sum up again this same argument, and, having said a few
10 2|      difficulties in which the argument of Erasistratus becomes
11 2|         occur if we accept the argument of the other Erasistrateans,
12 2|     the better sect. ~ Let our argument, then, be transferred again
13 2|        it: for the disjunctive argument used for the purposes of
14 2|    even in the division of his argument; he says that it is of no
15 2|        come to this poi in the argument, I should like to ask those
16 2| observed facts agree with this argument. Thus, those articles of
17 2|      is possible to base one's argument upon human beings, in whom
18 2| according to Erasistratus' own argument, the cause of the normal
19 2| compelled by the course of the argument. This subject has been treated
20 3|     call retentive. ~ Thus our argument has clearly shown the necessity
21 3|       of being detected by the argument. ~ Let us begin our exposition,
22 3|      the natural course of our argument, we have demonstrated these