Book

 1 1|               being, on the one hand, attractive and assimilative of what
 2 1|                certain faculties, one attractive ofwhat is appropriate, and
 3 1|               that the kidneyshave no attractive action at all; for his theory,
 4 1|             granted that there is any attractive faculty at all inthose things
 5 1|          whenonce we have granted the attractive faculty of the kidneys.
 6 2|           employ faculties which were attractive of what is appropriate,
 7 2|              acknowledge some kind of attractive faculty. ~ And what is the
 8 2|             is that he takes away the attractive faculty from the biliary
 9 2| disinclination to make any use of the attractive faculty, or is it that the
10 2|               latter having a faculty attractive of this particular quality [
11 3|               reason of its activity, attractive or epispastic. It has also
12 3|         activity corresponding to the attractive faculty. For the actual
13 3|         through the activation of the attractive faculty, whilst to have
14 3|       eliminative were to succeed the attractive faculty and there were not
15 3|          facts, then, again, both the attractive and the propulsive faculties
16 3|           proved the existence of the attractive, and, over and above this,
17 3|         existing in the stomach - the attractive faculty in connection with
18 3|               faculty is evident, the attractive faculty is not so obvious
19 3|          which is the opposite of the attractive. For opposite movements