Part, §

 1    Text,  II     |    Reputation and Authority of Sir Isaac Newton and his Followers,
 2    Text,  IX     |       decently to dissent from Sir Isaac Newton. I propose some helps
 3    Text,  IX     |       bodies of Dr. Barrow and Sir Isaac Newton, and burn them under
 4    Text,  XIII   |  prejudices. I freely own that Sir Isaac Newton hath shew'd himself
 5    Text,  XIV    |            your Idol. Great as Sir Isaac Newton was, I think he hath,
 6    Text,  XV     |       lowest degree to imitate Sir Isaac Newton.'' It might, perhaps,
 7    Text,  XV     |          further, or go beyond Sir Isaac Newton.'' And I am persuaded
 8    Text,  XV     |          know, not only beyond Sir Isaac Newton, but beyond all mankind.
 9    Text,  XVIII  |        knows as well as you or Sir Isaac Newton. And every one can
10    Text,  XIX    |             weigh the words of Sir Isaac. In answer to which I will
11    Text,  XXI    |            which I have placed Sir Isaac Newton. [NOTE: Analyst,
12    Text,  XXIII  |            P. 32) where I find Sir Isaac Newton using such expressions
13    Text,  XXIII  |           that if according to Sir Isaac Newton a Fluxion be the
14    Text,  XXV    | indivisibles is plain; because Sir Isaac disclaims this method as
15    Text,  XXVI   |     inconsiderable in practice Sir Isaac disowns your apology. Cave,
16    Text,  XXVI   |          your self to justifie Sir Isaac's method of getting rid
17    Text,  XXVII  |          of the second Book of Sir Isaac's principles, beginning
18    Text,  XXVIII |   demonstrate. But let us hear Sir Isaac's own words: Earum (quantitatum
19    Text,  XXIX   |         the venerable ghost of Sir Isaac Newton whispers you, the
20    Text,  XXIX   |      direct opposition to what Sir Isaac himself asserted when alive.
21    Text,  XXX    |         senses, you contradict Sir Isaac Newton. And if you take
22    Text,  XXX    |          legitimate reason for Sir Isaac's proceeding as he did?
23    Text,  XXXI   |            that quantity which Sir Isaac Newton through his whole
24    Text,  XXXI   |         from the first case of Sir Isaac's Lemma, he expressly determines
25    Text,  XXXII  |        Rectangle determined by Sir Isaac Newton, and the Increment
26    Text,  XXXII  |           of the first Book of Sir Isaac's Principles. I answer,
27    Text,  XXXII  |           incrementum, whether Sir Isaac's or mine, are in that Case
28    Text,  XXXIII |      Geometry, or according to Sir Isaac's own Principles; for the
29    Text,  XXXIII |        that this latter is not Sir Isaac's sense is evident from
30    Text,  XXXIII |       angry with, to wit, that Sir Isaac's followers are much more
31    Text,  XXXIV  |           above-cited passage, Sir Isaac means their being actually
32    Text,  XXXIV  |            it was not possible Sir Isaac Newton could be guilty of
33    Text,  XXXIV  |         expect no quarter from Sir Isaac's followers. And I tell
34    Text,  XXXV   |          as very hard usage of Sir Isaac Newton. You declaim copiously,
35    Text,  XXXVI  |            to tell me, whether Sir Isaac's momentum be a finite quantity,
36    Text,  XXXVII |        much seemed plain, that Sir Isaac had sometime owned himself
37    Text,  XXXVII |        which the very words of Sir Isaac should alone be inserted.
38    Text,  XXXVII |           mathematical matter, Sir Isaac expresseth himself, in the
39    Text,  XXXVII |            from those words of Sir Isaac Newton; and whether the
40    Text,  XXXVIII|           it, that I represent Sir Isaac's Conclusions as coming
41    Text,  XXXVIII|         who have misapplied to Sir Isaac what was intended for the
42    Text,  XXXVIII|       ingenious portraiture of Sir Isaac Newton and Dame Fortune,
43    Text,  XXXIX  |     discovery of my own, which Sir Isaac and his followers never
44    Text,  XXXIX  |           and fully removed by Sir Isaac Newton in the first section
45    Text,  XL     |              XL. If you defend Sir Isaac's notions as delivered in
46    Text,  XL     |            whom alone, and not Sir Isaac this double errour in finding
47    Text,  XLIV   |          another, and all from Sir Isaac Newton. Some plead inaccurate
48    Text,  XLIV   |  considering that we, who deny Sir Isaac Newton's Authority, shall
49    Text,  XLVIII |     animadvert on Mr. Locke or Sir Isaac Newton, as they would on
50     App          |        WALTON's~VINDICATION~Of Sir ISAAC NEWTON's~Principles of FLUXIONS ~
51     App,  I      |            a few passages from Sir Isaac Newton's Principia, and
52     App,  II     |     Philalethes, p. 32.] about Sir Isaac's first Section concerning
53     App,  II     |          have been ascribed to Sir Isaac Newton (P. 36). And this
54     App,  II     |          to have been, because Sir Isaac Newton had presumed to interpose
55     App,  III    |          he understands either Sir Isaac Newton, or me, or himself, (
56     App,  IV     |        diminished (P. 9), when Sir Isaac Newton hath expressly excluded