Part, §
1 Text, III | sufficiently explained this in the Analyst. But for your further Satisfaction
2 Text, IV | what hath been said in the Analyst be not sufficient; suppose
3 Text, VI | self; but I addressed my Analyst to an Infidel; and on very
4 Text, XVII | Infinitesimal, and so onward. [NOTE: Analyst, Sect. 4, 5, 6, &c.] What
5 Text, XX | well as the most profound Analyst what idea he frames or can
6 Text, XXI | Sir Isaac Newton. [NOTE: Analyst, Sect. 18.] Hereupon you
7 Text, XXIV | to any one who reads the Analyst, that I wonder how you could
8 Text, XXV | fifty third Queries in the Analyst. And that the method of
9 Text, XXV | have seen quoted in the Analyst, and yet you seem ignorant
10 Text, XXXIII | Quadratures, and considered in the Analyst [NOTE: Sect. 13, 14, &c.].
11 Text, XXXV | seventeenth section of the Analyst. ``Considering the various
12 Text, XXXVII | seventeenth section of the Analyst. It is one thing when a
13 Text, XXXVIII| manifest to whoever reads the Analyst. ~
14 Text, XL | at large explained in the Analyst, and shewed in that particular
15 Text, XLI | defence would never read the Analyst. If he doth, He cannot but
16 Text, XLI | consider the Geometrical Analyst as a Logician i.e. so far
17 Text, XLI | such inferences.'' [NOTE: `Analyst,' Sect. 20.] You affirm (
18 Text, XLII | distinctly noted in the Analyst, that I very much wonder
19 Text, XLIII | difficulties proposed in the Analyst are discreetly overlooked
20 Text, XLIII | thoughts thereupon in the Analyst. And since the publication
21 Text, XLIV | been largely said in the Analyst [NOTE: Sect. 19, 20. &c.]
22 Text, XLIX | surprised at the tendency of my Analyst. ~
23 App, II | points mentioned in the Analyst, about all which I observe
24 App, II | in the person to whom the Analyst was addressed, and certain
25 App, II | double errour, which in the Analyst was plainly meant to belong
26 App, III | any one objection in the Analyst answered, or so much as
27 App, III | difficulties proposed in the Analyst, sheweth no inclination
|