Part, §
1 Text, II | are not such Masters of Reason as they are generally presumed
2 Text, V | not to own, that Men who reason well, are Enemies to Religion,
3 Text, V | are defective in Point of Reason and Judgement, and that
4 Text, VI | undertake to defend Religion by Reason. If we resolve all into
5 Text, VI | Faith: And if we attempt to Reason, they are angry at us: They
6 Text, VI | no Means those Masters of Reason; which they would fain pass
7 Text, VII | that we have no better Reason for our Religion, than you
8 Text, VII | living, was one principal reason assigned by a witty man
9 Text, X | Fluxions cannot be defended by reason, he will be as little surprised
10 Text, XIII | examined by the test of Reason. Another sort there is who
11 Text, XX | up by applying them. The reason of which is, because in
12 Text, XXX | this a just and legitimate reason for Sir Isaac's proceeding
13 Text, XXX | thing. I find no sense or reason in what you say. Let the
14 Text, XXXI | and without any Shadow of Reason given, supposed and determined
15 Text, XXXIII| is, instead of giving a reason you declaim. I, on the contrary
16 Text, XXXIII| absolutely nothing at all. My reason is, because without that
17 Text, XXXV | am offended for this very reason; because I cannot understand
18 Text, XL | method doth not depend on the reason assigned by the Marquis,
19 Text, XL | as not knowing the true reason for the conclusions coming
20 Text, XLI | of a contrary opinion. My reason is because nothing cannot
21 Text, XLI | being evident that a man may reason most absurdly about the
22 Text, XLVIII| attached to Truth, see no reason why I may not as freely
23 Text, L | anything without assigning a reason, nor affecting to mistake
24 Text, L | to the severest test of Reason should be reckoned a discouragement
|