Part, §
1 Text, XXIV | Rectangle of two flowing quantities; and that he did not fairly
2 Text, XXVI | oft as you talk of finite quantities inconsiderable in practice
3 Text, XXVI | intellexeris finitas. And, although Quantities less than sensible may be
4 Text, XXVII | rectangle of two flowing quantities, nor in anything preceding
5 Text, XXVII | rectangle of such flowing quantities.'' Now I affirm the direct
6 Text, XXVII | the moments of the flowing quantities A and B are called a and
7 Text, XXVIII| decrement of the flowing quantities, you would have us conclude,
8 Text, XXVIII| represent the two mathematical quantities as pleading their rights,
9 Text, XXXII | that if a and b are real quantities, then ab is something, and
10 Text, XXXII | Method of exhaustions, where quantities less than assignable are
11 Text, XXXII | momentums, to argue that quantities must be equal because they
12 Text, XXXII | being themselves assignable quantities, their differences cannot
13 Text, XXXII | with, a method, wherein Quantities, less than any given, are
14 Text, XXXIII| the product of two real quantities is something real; and that
15 Text, XXXIII| augments either are real quantities, or they are not. If you
16 Text, XXXIII| indeed get rid of those quantities in the composition whereof
17 Text, XXXVI | the nascent or evanescent quantities themselves, or their motions,
18 Text, XL | casting away infinitely small quantities. If you defend the Marquis,
19 Text, XL | they are nevertheless real quantities, and themselves infinitely
20 Text, XLIV | between nothings. Some reject quantities because infinitesimal. Others
21 Text, XLIV | Others allow only finite quantities, and reject them because
22 Text, XLIV | evanescent increments to be real quantities, some to be nothings, some
23 App, IV | excluded all consideration of quantities infinitely small? [NOTE:
24 App, IV | vindicator should say that quantities infinitely diminished are
|