Part, §
1 Text, III | Mysteries in Religion, admit the Doctrine of Fluxions for true and
2 Text, VII | Infidel, who believes the Doctrine of Fluxions, acts a very
3 Text, XI | for having defended their Doctrine, in the same manner as any
4 Text, XII | undertakes to defend the doctrine of Fluxions, I can easily
5 Text, XIV | his demonstration of the Doctrine of Fluxions I take to be
6 Text, XVII | you could name, that the Doctrine of Fluxions may be clearly
7 Text, XXV | remember this is not the Doctrine of Fluxions: it is none
8 Text, XXXII | directly demolishing the very Doctrine you would defend. For it
9 Text, XXXII | with, and subversive of the doctrine of Fluxions. And, indeed,
10 Text, XXXV | enabled you to understand his Doctrine. But as for me who do not
11 Text, XXXVI | condescend to explain the Doctrine of second, third, and fourth
12 Text, XXXVI | whom I could name that the Doctrine may be clearly conceived
13 Text, XXXVII| several accounts of this Doctrine given by the great Author
14 Text, XXXVII| It is one thing when a Doctrine is placed in various lights:
15 Text, XXXVII| substituted for others, a Doctrine instead of being illustrated
16 Text, XXXVII| there is not one uniform doctrine explained and carried throughout
17 Text, XLVIII| to illustrate Mr. Locke's Doctrine, and where your mistake
18 Text, XLVIII| may be fairly put. This doctrine of abstract general ideas
19 App, III | finds any one point of the doctrine of Fluxions cleared up,
|