Part, §

 1    Text,  III   | Mysteries in Religion, admit the Doctrine of Fluxions for true and
 2    Text,  VII   |        Infidel, who believes the Doctrine of Fluxions, acts a very
 3    Text,  XI    |        for having defended their Doctrine, in the same manner as any
 4    Text,  XII   |         undertakes to defend the doctrine of Fluxions, I can easily
 5    Text,  XIV   |         his demonstration of the Doctrine of Fluxions I take to be
 6    Text,  XVII  |         you could name, that the Doctrine of Fluxions may be clearly
 7    Text,  XXV   |         remember this is not the Doctrine of Fluxions: it is none
 8    Text,  XXXII |    directly demolishing the very Doctrine you would defend. For it
 9    Text,  XXXII |      with, and subversive of the doctrine of Fluxions. And, indeed,
10    Text,  XXXV  |    enabled you to understand his Doctrine. But as for me who do not
11    Text,  XXXVI |        condescend to explain the Doctrine of second, third, and fourth
12    Text,  XXXVI |       whom I could name that the Doctrine may be clearly conceived
13    Text,  XXXVII|         several accounts of this Doctrine given by the great Author
14    Text,  XXXVII|           It is one thing when a Doctrine is placed in various lights:
15    Text,  XXXVII|        substituted for others, a Doctrine instead of being illustrated
16    Text,  XXXVII|         there is not one uniform doctrine explained and carried throughout
17    Text,  XLVIII|        to illustrate Mr. Locke's Doctrine, and where your mistake
18    Text,  XLVIII|          may be fairly put. This doctrine of abstract general ideas
19     App,  III   |       finds any one point of the doctrine of Fluxions cleared up,