Part, §

 1    Text,  VI    |        Mistake; but even in that Case, my Remarks upon Fluxions
 2    Text,  VIII  |      judge for himself. In which case he will be able to discern (
 3    Text,  XXIV  |         That this was really the case, and that the smallness
 4    Text,  XXVII |        same page, from the first case of the second lemma of the
 5    Text,  XXVIII|          fain perplex this plain case by distinguishing between
 6    Text,  XXVIII|       would call the moment? The case you say is difficult. My
 7    Text,  XXIX  |          candidly represent your case to be that of an ass between
 8    Text,  XXXI  |          citation from the first case of Sir Isaac's Lemma, he
 9    Text,  XXXII |     Isaac's or mine, are in that Case nothing at all. As for the
10    Text,  XXXIII|          be not the truth of the case? Whether the former expression
11    Text,  XXXVI |        what we find in the first case of the second Lemma in the
12    Text,  XXXVII| something of this in the present case I appeal to the writings
13    Text,  XXXVII|       and can in that particular case, I leave to be determined
14    Text,  XL    |        shewed in that particular case of Tangents, that the Rejectaneous
15    Text,  XLI   |       Logic or the Theory of the case specified, which is the
16    Text,  XLVII |          whether this be not the case; and whether he can distinctly
17     App,  II    |   Philalethes, from a particular case makes a general inference,
18     App,  III   |          it. Whether this be the case of Mr. Walton, and whether