Paragraph

 1 1 |                          1. The Monad, of which we shall here
 2 6 |      Thus it may be said that a Monad can only come into being
 3 7 |         way of explaining how a Monad can be altered in quality
 4 7 |        accident can come into a Monad from outside.~
 5 9 |                 9. Indeed, each Monad must be different from every
 6 10|        consequently the created Monad, is subject to change, and
 7 16|        this multiplicity in the Monad; and M. Bayle ought not
 8 20|  perceptibly differ from a bare Monad; but as this state is not
 9 20|      something more than a bare Monad. (Theod. 64.)~
10 48|     degree of perfection of the Monad. (Theod. 87.)~
11 49|      action] is attributed to a Monad, in so far as it has distinct
12 51| substances the influence of one Monad upon another is only ideal,
13 51|         in the ideas of God any Monad rightly claims that God,
14 51|       it. For since one created Monad cannot have any physical
15 57|   special point of view of each Monad. (Theod. 147.)~
16 60|       and in particular to each Monad, whose nature being to represent,
17 60|      the Monads; otherwise each Monad would be a deity. It is
18 62|     Thus, although each created Monad represents the whole universe,
19 63|         The body belonging to a Monad (which is its entelechy
20 63|   always organic; for, as every Monad is, in its own way, a mirror