Paragraph

 1 1 |         speak, is nothing but a simple substance, which enters
 2 1 |      enters into compounds. By ‘simple’ is meant ‘without parts.’ (
 3 2 |            2. And there must be simple substances, since there
 4 2 |     collection or aggregatum of simple things.~
 5 4 |      conceivable way in which a simple substance can be destroyed
 6 5 |      conceivable way in which a simple substance can come into
 7 8 |         existing things. And if simple substances did not differ
 8 8 | compound can come only from the simple elements it contains, and
 9 12|       nature and variety of the simple substances.~
10 13|      unite] or in that which is simple. For, as every natural change
11 13|   unchanged; and consequently a simple substance must be affected
12 14|      the unit [unite] or in the simple substance, is nothing but
13 16| experience of a multiplicity in simple substance, when we find
14 16|        admit that the soul is a simple substance should admit this
15 17|     perception. Thus it is in a simple substance, and not in a
16 17|      changes) can be found in a simple substance. It is also in
17 17|      the internal activities of simple substances can consist. (
18 18|                         18. All simple substances or created Monads
19 19|        have explained, then all simple substances or created Monads
20 19|  Entelechies should suffice for simple substances which have perception
21 21|   follow that in this state the simple substance is without any
22 22|        every present state of a simple substance is naturally a
23 30|     being, of substance, of the simple and the compound, of the
24 33|          resolving it into more simple ideas and truths, until
25 35|         35. In short, there are simple ideas, of which no definition
26 47|       primary unity or original simple substance, of which all
27 51|                      51. But in simple substances the influence
28 52|          For God, comparing two simple substances, finds in each
29 56|         to all, means that each simple substance has relations
30 57|       of the infinite number of simple substances, it is as if
31 61|         with [symbolisent avec] simple substances. For all is a