| Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | ||
| Alphabetical [« »] agreeableness 3 agreed 29 agreeing 12 agreement 176 agreements 5 agrees 8 ague 1 | Frequency [« »] 177 proposition 177 world 176 abstract 176 agreement 174 least 173 both 173 certainty | John Locke An essay concerning human understanding IntraText - Concordances agreement |
Book, Chapter
1 I, I | may come to that universal agreement, in the things they do consent 2 I, I | learnt, and wherein the agreement or disagreement we can perceive 3 I, III | to words expressing the agreement or disagreement of such 4 II, XV | duration have this further agreement, that, though they are both 5 II, XVI | as well as it is, in its agreement to all other things, the 6 II, XXI | connexion or repugnancy, agreement or disagreement, that there 7 II, XXV | things, in any manner of agreement, disagreement, or respect 8 II, XXVIII| depending upon men’s wills, or agreement in society, I call instituted, 9 II, XXVIII| obliquity consists in the agreement or disagreement with those 10 II, XXVIII| ideas wherein it is founded: agreement or disagreement, whereon 11 II, XXVIII| mistaken in it; yet the agreement or disagreement observable 12 II, XXVIII| compare it to, which is agreement or disagreement. ~ 13 II, XXXII | separated, according to the agreement or disagreement of the things 14 III, VI | the common appearances and agreement of substances as they really 15 III, VI | by Nature, that they have agreement and likeness one with another, 16 III, VI | be known to us by their agreement or disagreement with the 17 III, VII | nor that he observes the agreement or disagreement of some 18 III, XI | language brings men to an agreement in the signification of 19 IV, I | is the perception of the agreement or disagreement of two ideas. 20 IV, I | of the connexion of and agreement, or disagreement and repugnancy 21 IV, I | angles of a triangle?~3. This agreement or disagreement may be any 22 IV, I | distinctly wherein this agreement or disagreement consists, 23 IV, I | As to the first sort of agreement or disagreement, viz. identity 24 IV, I | This then is the first agreement or disagreement which the 25 IV, I | Secondly, the next sort of agreement or disagreement the mind 26 IV, I | ideas, and find out the agreement or disagreement they have 27 IV, I | Thirdly, The third sort of agreement or disagreement to be found 28 IV, I | Within these four sorts of agreement or disagreement is, I suppose, 29 IV, I | are such peculiar ways of agreement or disagreement of our ideas, 30 IV, I | view the mind has of the agreement or disagreement of any of 31 IV, I | evidently perceived the agreement or disagreement of the ideas 32 IV, I | immediate view, discover their agreement or disagreement one with 33 IV, I | this matter is, that the agreement or disagreement of the ideas 34 IV, I | intermediate ideas whereby the agreement or disagreement of those 35 IV, I | intermediate ideas, that show the agreement or disagreement of the ideas 36 IV, I | what he did before. The agreement of the two ideas joined 37 IV, II | perception the mind has of the agreement or disagreement of any of 38 IV, II | sometimes the mind perceives the agreement or disagreement of two ideas 39 IV, II | where the mind perceives the agreement or disagreement of any ideas, 40 IV, II | wherever the mind perceives the agreement or disagreement of any of 41 IV, II | that the mind sees that agreement or disagreement, which there 42 IV, II | always perceive presently the agreement or disagreement of two ideas, 43 IV, II | ideas, concerning whose agreement or disagreement the inquiry 44 IV, II | another, to perceive their agreement or disagreement, it is fain, 45 IV, II | happens) to discover the agreement or disagreement which it 46 IV, II | being willing to know the agreement or disagreement in bigness 47 IV, II | which serve to show the agreement of any two others, are called 48 IV, II | called proofs; and where the agreement and disagreement is by this 49 IV, II | that shall discover the agreement or disagreement of any other,) 50 IV, II | does at last perceive the agreement or disagreement of the ideas 51 IV, II | and come to perceive the agreement or repugnancy between two 52 IV, II | intermediate ideas, the agreement or disagreement is perceived, 53 IV, II | perception, it will perceive the agreement or disagreement of those 54 IV, II | retains the similitude and agreement with the object, it produces 55 IV, II | intuitive knowledge of that agreement or disagreement it seeks 56 IV, II | without the perception of such agreement or disagreement, there is 57 IV, II | common measure, to show their agreement or disagreement. By which 58 IV, II | remember it, to make the agreement or disagreement of the ideas 59 IV, II | to perceive the immediate agreement of the intervening ideas, 60 IV, II | intervening ideas, whereby the agreement or disagreement of the two 61 IV, II | intuitive perception of the agreement or disagreement of the intermediate 62 IV, II | certainty: but to have such an agreement or disagreement as may intuitively 63 IV, II | can perceive the immediate agreement or disagreement that is 64 IV, II | where it can perceive the agreement or disagreement of any two 65 IV, II | intuitive perception of the agreement or disagreement they have 66 IV, II | in the perception of the agreement or disagreement of any two 67 IV, II | obscure perception of their agreement, and so have but a very 68 IV, III | in the perception of the agreement or disagreement of any of 69 IV, III | than we can perceive their agreement or disagreement. Secondly, 70 IV, III | have perception of that agreement or disagreement. Which perception 71 IV, III | By reason, examining the agreement or disagreement of two ideas, 72 IV, III | equal or no; because their agreement or disagreement in equality 73 IV, III | to see the connexion and agreement of very many ideas, and 74 IV, III | diversity. In this way of agreement or disagreement of our ideas, 75 IV, III | second sort, which is the agreement or disagreement of our ideas 76 IV, III | our knowledge, viz. the agreement or disagreement of any of 77 IV, III | proofs or examining the agreement or disagreement of remote 78 IV, III | examine or pursue their agreement or disagreement. “Where 79 IV, III | complex ideas to show the agreement or disagreement of two remote 80 IV, III | ideas, and considering their agreement or disagreement, and the 81 IV, III | mind at all to perceive the agreement of any two or more numbers, 82 IV, III | show us what habitude of agreement or disagreement they have 83 IV, III | or certainly discover the agreement or disagreement of ideas 84 IV, III | ideas are abstract, whose agreement or disagreement we perceive, 85 IV, IV | only the perception of the agreement or disagreement of our own 86 IV, IV | ideas, and perceive their agreement and disagreement one with 87 IV, IV | in the perception of the agreement or disagreement of our own 88 IV, IV | so a man observe but the agreement of his own imaginations, 89 IV, IV | be the criterion of this agreement? It is evident the mind 90 IV, IV | but the perception of the agreement or disagreement of our ideas, 91 IV, IV | but the perception of such agreement, by the intervention of 92 IV, IV | complete ideas; all the agreement or disagreement which we 93 IV, IV | Whatever ideas we have, the agreement we find they have with others 94 IV, IV | Wherever we perceive the agreement or disagreement of any of 95 IV, IV | real knowledge. Of which agreement of our ideas with the reality 96 IV, V | perceiving or judging of their agreement or disagreement.~Secondly, 97 IV, V | perceiving, or supposing, the agreement or disagreement of any of 98 IV, V | our heads, and have their agreement or disagreement there, as 99 IV, V | together according to the agreement of the ideas in our minds: 100 IV, V | ideas in our minds: and the agreement of the idea of animal with 101 IV, V | visible to the mind, as the agreement of the idea of animal with 102 IV, V | the mind that have not an agreement with the reality of things. 103 IV, V | joined according to the agreement or disagreement of the ideas 104 IV, V | marking down in words the agreement or disagreement of ideas 105 IV, V | marking down in words the agreement or disagreement of ideas 106 IV, V | and the perception of the agreement or disagreement of those 107 IV, VI | as exactly to express the agreement or disagreement of the ideas 108 IV, VI | knowledge is to perceive the agreement or disagreement of ideas, 109 IV, VI | Wherever we perceive any agreement or disagreement amongst 110 IV, VI | stand for such ideas, whose agreement or disagreement, as there 111 IV, VII | in the perception of the agreement or disagreement of ideas. 112 IV, VII | of ideas. Now, where that agreement or disagreement is perceived 113 IV, VII | his assent is from that agreement or disagreement which the 114 IV, VII | over these several sorts of agreement or disagreement of ideas 115 IV, VII | immediate perception of the agreement or disagreement of identity 116 IV, VII | necessarily be also: of such agreement or disagreement as this, 117 IV, VII | perception it has of the agreement or disagreement of its ideas, 118 IV, VII | them by perceiving their agreement or disagreement. In the 119 IV, VII | intermediate ideas that showed the agreement or disagreement of the ideas, 120 IV, VII | these maxims, to prove the agreement or disagreement of any of 121 IV, VIII | understanding may see the agreement or disagreement of those 122 IV, XI | wherein is expressed the agreement or disagreement of our abstract 123 IV, XI | propositions depends on the agreement or disagreement to be discovered 124 IV, XI | that will arise from the agreement or disagreement which he 125 IV, XII | perception we have of the agreement or disagreement of our ideas, 126 IV, XII | with another, finding their agreement and disagreement, and their 127 IV, XII | discoverable connexion and agreement one with another; so far 128 IV, XII | intermediate ideas which show their agreement or disagreement, are the 129 IV, XII | ideas, which may show us the agreement or repugnancy of other ideas, 130 IV, XIII | cannot but perceive the agreement or disagreement of some 131 IV, XIII | some measure observe the agreement or disagreement that is 132 IV, XIII | propositions which express that agreement or disagreement they perceive 133 IV, XIV | not warily to examine the agreement or disagreement of two ideas 134 IV, XIV | demonstration, determine of the agreement or disagreement of two ideas, 135 IV, XIV | undoubtedly satisfied of the agreement or disagreement of any ideas.~ 136 IV, XIV | mind, when their certain agreement or disagreement is not perceived, 137 IV, XV | Probability is the appearance of agreement upon fallible proofs. As 138 IV, XV | demonstration is the showing the agreement or disagreement of two ideas 139 IV, XV | the appearance of such an agreement or disagreement by the intervention 140 IV, XV | intuitive knowledge of the agreement or disagreement of the intermediate 141 IV, XV | which clearly shows the agreement or disagreement of those 142 IV, XV | not manifestly showing the agreement or disagreement of those 143 IV, XVI | own experience, and the agreement of all others that mention 144 IV, XVII | consists in a perception of the agreement or disagreement of our own 145 IV, XVII | see, either the certain agreement or disagreement of any two 146 IV, XVII | knowledge, i.e. by the visible agreement of ideas. Tell a country 147 IV, XVII | with the two other, whose agreement should be shown by it, will 148 IV, XVII | virtue of the perceived agreement of the intermediate idea 149 IV, XVII | without shame to deny the agreement of ideas that do manifestly 150 IV, XVII | applied to, to show their agreement; and when they see that, 151 IV, XVII | faculty to perceive the agreement or disagreement of such 152 IV, XVII | that the perception of the agreement or disagreement of our particular 153 IV, XVII | But the perception of the agreement or disagreement of any two 154 IV, XVII | intervention, to show the agreement or disagreement of the two 155 IV, XVII | more natural, and show the agreement or disagreement of the extremes 156 IV, XVII | the certain or probable agreement or disagreement of any other 157 IV, XVII | we cannot discern their agreement or disagreement by an immediate 158 IV, XVII | demonstrative. First, Those whose agreement or disagreement, though 159 IV, XVII | In this case, when the agreement or disagreement of the intermediate 160 IV, XVII | of the intuition of the agreement of the medium, or intermediate 161 IV, XVII | is the greater. For each agreement or disagreement of the ideas 162 IV, XVII | intuition it had of the agreement of any idea with another, 163 IV, XVII | a fourth, &c., there the agreement of the first and the fourth 164 IV, XVII | There are other ideas, whose agreement or disagreement can no otherwise 165 IV, XVII | which have not a certain agreement with the extremes, but an 166 IV, XVII | perception of the certain agreement or disagreement of two ideas 167 IV, XVII | perception of the certain agreement or disagreement of any two 168 IV, XVII | more ideas, whose certain agreement or disagreement with them 169 IV, XVII | ratiocination is the finding the agreement or disagreement of two ideas 170 IV, XVIII | distinct perception of the agreement or disagreement of our own 171 IV, XVIII | clear perception of the agreement or disagreement of our ideas, 172 IV, XVIII | evident a perception of their agreement, that we can never assent 173 IV, XVIII | clear perception of the agreement or disagreement of any of 174 IV, XX | than knowledge. When the agreement of any two ideas appears 175 IV, XX | our knowledge, where the agreement is once perceived; nor our 176 IV, XX | where he perceives the agreement or disagreement of any two