Book,  Chapter

  1      I,  I     |         wherein the agreement or disagreement we can perceive in our ideas
  2      I,  III   |      expressing the agreement or disagreement of such ideas, will necessarily
  3     II,  XXI   |         repugnancy, agreement or disagreement, that there is between any
  4     II,  XXV   |         any manner of agreement, disagreement, or respect whatsoever.
  5     II,  XXVIII|       which is the conformity or disagreement men’s voluntary actions
  6     II,  XXVIII|        is only the conformity or disagreement of our voluntary actions
  7     II,  XXVIII|     consists in the agreement or disagreement with those patterns prescribed
  8     II,  XXVIII|          their conformity to, or disagreement with some rule that makes
  9     II,  XXVIII|         is founded: agreement or disagreement, whereon relation depends,
 10     II,  XXVIII|         it; yet the agreement or disagreement observable in that which
 11     II,  XXVIII|        to, which is agreement or disagreement.  ~
 12     II,  XXXII |    according to the agreement or disagreement of the things they stand
 13    III,  VI    |         us by their agreement or disagreement with the complex idea that
 14    III,  VII   |        observes the agreement or disagreement of some of them; but he
 15     IV,  I     |   perception of the agreement or disagreement of two ideas. Knowledge
 16     IV,  I     |   connexion of and agreement, or disagreement and repugnancy of any of
 17     IV,  I     |   triangle?~3. This agreement or disagreement may be any of four sorts.
 18     IV,  I     |        wherein this agreement or disagreement consists, I think we may
 19     IV,  I     |       first sort of agreement or disagreement, viz. identity or diversity.
 20     IV,  I     |        is the first agreement or disagreement which the mind perceives
 21     IV,  I     |        next sort of agreement or disagreement the mind perceives in any
 22     IV,  I     |        find out the agreement or disagreement they have one with another,
 23     IV,  I     |       third sort of agreement or disagreement to be found in our ideas,
 24     IV,  I     |       four sorts of agreement or disagreement is, I suppose, contained
 25     IV,  I     |    peculiar ways of agreement or disagreement of our ideas, that they
 26     IV,  I     |          has of the agreement or disagreement of any of its ideas, or
 27     IV,  I     |       perceived the agreement or disagreement of the ideas whereof it
 28     IV,  I     |      discover their agreement or disagreement one with another.~Secondly,
 29     IV,  I     |        is, that the agreement or disagreement of the ideas in this case
 30     IV,  I     |         whereby the agreement or disagreement of those in the proposition
 31     IV,  I     |       that show the agreement or disagreement of the ideas contained in
 32     IV,  II    |          has of the agreement or disagreement of any of its ideas. For
 33     IV,  II    |       perceives the agreement or disagreement of two ideas immediately
 34     IV,  II    |       perceives the agreement or disagreement of any ideas, but not immediately.
 35     IV,  II    |       perceives the agreement or disagreement of any of its ideas, there
 36     IV,  II    |      mind sees that agreement or disagreement, which there is between
 37     IV,  II    |       presently the agreement or disagreement of two ideas, is, because
 38     IV,  II    |    concerning whose agreement or disagreement the inquiry is made, cannot
 39     IV,  II    |      perceive their agreement or disagreement, it is fain, by the intervention
 40     IV,  II    |        discover the agreement or disagreement which it searches; and this
 41     IV,  II    |         to know the agreement or disagreement in bigness between the three
 42     IV,  II    |          where the agreement and disagreement is by this means plainly
 43     IV,  II    |        discover the agreement or disagreement of any other,) and to apply
 44     IV,  II    |        perceive the agreement or disagreement of the ideas it considers;
 45     IV,  II    |          ideas, the agreement or disagreement is perceived, yet before
 46     IV,  II    |        perceive the agreement or disagreement of those ideas that produce
 47     IV,  II    |   knowledge of that agreement or disagreement it seeks with the next intermediate
 48     IV,  II    |  perception of such agreement or disagreement, there is no knowledge produced:
 49     IV,  II    |          show their agreement or disagreement. By which it is plain that
 50     IV,  II    |         to make the agreement or disagreement of the ideas concerning
 51     IV,  II    |         whereby the agreement or disagreement of the two ideas under examination (
 52     IV,  II    |   perception of the agreement or disagreement of the intermediate ideas,
 53     IV,  II    |        have such an agreement or disagreement as may intuitively be perceived,
 54     IV,  II    |       the immediate agreement or disagreement that is between them, there
 55     IV,  II    |        perceive the agreement or disagreement of any two ideas, by an
 56     IV,  II    |   perception of the agreement or disagreement they have with any intermediate
 57     IV,  II    |   perception of the agreement or disagreement of any two ideas, its clearness
 58     IV,  III   |   perception of the agreement or disagreement of any of our ideas, it
 59     IV,  III   |      perceive their agreement or disagreement. Secondly, That we can have
 60     IV,  III   |  perception of that agreement or disagreement. Which perception being:
 61     IV,  III   |       examining the agreement or disagreement of two ideas, by the intervention
 62     IV,  III   |       because their agreement or disagreement in equality can never be
 63     IV,  III   |         this way of agreement or disagreement of our ideas, our intuitive
 64     IV,  III   |        which is the agreement or disagreement of our ideas in co-existence,
 65     IV,  III   | knowledge, viz. the agreement or disagreement of any of our ideas in any
 66     IV,  III   |       examining the agreement or disagreement of remote ideas. They that
 67     IV,  III   |        pursue their agreement or disagreement. “Where there is no property
 68     IV,  III   |         to show the agreement or disagreement of two remote ones.~The
 69     IV,  III   |   considering their agreement or disagreement, and the resolution of the
 70     IV,  III   |         habitude of agreement or disagreement they have one with another.
 71     IV,  III   |        discover the agreement or disagreement of ideas themselves, whilst
 72     IV,  III   |     abstract, whose agreement or disagreement we perceive, our knowledge
 73     IV,  IV    |   perception of the agreement or disagreement of our own ideas: but who
 74     IV,  IV    |     perceive their agreement and disagreement one with another. If there
 75     IV,  IV    |   perception of the agreement or disagreement of our own ideas, the visions
 76     IV,  IV    |   perception of the agreement or disagreement of our ideas, and demonstration
 77     IV,  IV    |      ideas; all the agreement or disagreement which we shall find in them
 78     IV,  IV    |        perceive the agreement or disagreement of any of our ideas, there
 79     IV,  V     |    judging of their agreement or disagreement.~Secondly, Verbal propositions,
 80     IV,  V     |      supposing, the agreement or disagreement of any of its ideas, does
 81     IV,  V     |          have their agreement or disagreement there, as well as the ideas
 82     IV,  V     |    according to the agreement or disagreement of the ideas they stand
 83     IV,  V     |        in words the agreement or disagreement of ideas as it is. Falsehood
 84     IV,  V     |        in words the agreement or disagreement of ideas otherwise than
 85     IV,  V     |   perception of the agreement or disagreement of those ideas, according
 86     IV,  VI    |         express the agreement or disagreement of the ideas they stand
 87     IV,  VI    |        perceive the agreement or disagreement of ideas, as expressed in
 88     IV,  VI    |        perceive any agreement or disagreement amongst them, there we have
 89     IV,  VI    |        ideas, whose agreement or disagreement, as there expressed, is
 90     IV,  VII   |   perception of the agreement or disagreement of ideas. Now, where that
 91     IV,  VII   |          where that agreement or disagreement is perceived immediately
 92     IV,  VII   |        is from that agreement or disagreement which the mind, by an immediate
 93     IV,  VII   |    several sorts of agreement or disagreement of ideas which I have above
 94     IV,  VII   |   perception of the agreement or disagreement of identity being founded
 95     IV,  VII   |       also: of such agreement or disagreement as this, the mind has an
 96     IV,  VII   |          has of the agreement or disagreement of its ideas, according
 97     IV,  VII   |    perceiving their agreement or disagreement. In the other, God himself
 98     IV,  VII   |          showed the agreement or disagreement of the ideas, as expressed
 99     IV,  VII   |        to prove the agreement or disagreement of any of them. He that
100     IV,  VIII  |         may see the agreement or disagreement of those in question. Propositions
101     IV,  XI    |       expressed the agreement or disagreement of our abstract ideas, and
102     IV,  XI    |      depends on the agreement or disagreement to be discovered in those
103     IV,  XI    |      arise from the agreement or disagreement which he will perceive in
104     IV,  XII   |         have of the agreement or disagreement of our ideas, the way to
105     IV,  XII   |      finding their agreement and disagreement, and their several relations
106     IV,  XII   |          show their agreement or disagreement, are the ways to enlarge
107     IV,  XIII  |        perceive the agreement or disagreement of some of them one with
108     IV,  XIII  |         observe the agreement or disagreement that is to be found amongst
109     IV,  XIII  |        express that agreement or disagreement they perceive in them, and
110     IV,  XIV   |         examine the agreement or disagreement of two ideas which they
111     IV,  XIV   |    determine of the agreement or disagreement of two ideas, as it were
112     IV,  XIV   |    satisfied of the agreement or disagreement of any ideas.~Secondly JUDGMENT,
113     IV,  XIV   |       their certain agreement or disagreement is not perceived, but presumed
114     IV,  XV    |         showing the agreement or disagreement of two ideas by the intervention
115     IV,  XV    |          of such an agreement or disagreement by the intervention of proofs,
116     IV,  XV    |    knowledge of the agreement or disagreement of the intermediate ideas
117     IV,  XV    |   clearly shows the agreement or disagreement of those three angles in
118     IV,  XV    |         showing the agreement or disagreement of those ideas that are
119     IV,  XVII  |   perception of the agreement or disagreement of our own ideas, and the
120     IV,  XVII  |         the certain agreement or disagreement of any two ideas, as in
121     IV,  XVII  |        perceive the agreement or disagreement of such ideas, (without
122     IV,  XVII  |   perception of the agreement or disagreement of our particular ideas
123     IV,  XVII  |   perception of the agreement or disagreement of any two ideas, and consequently
124     IV,  XVII  |         to show the agreement or disagreement of the two in question,
125     IV,  XVII  |        and show the agreement or disagreement of the extremes clearer
126     IV,  XVII  |         or probable agreement or disagreement of any other two ideas:
127     IV,  XVII  |       discern their agreement or disagreement by an immediate comparing
128     IV,  XVII  |         Those whose agreement or disagreement, though it cannot be seen
129     IV,  XVII  |      case, when the agreement or disagreement of the intermediate idea,
130     IV,  XVII  |   greater. For each agreement or disagreement of the ideas must be observed
131     IV,  XVII  |        ideas, whose agreement or disagreement can no otherwise be judged
132     IV,  XVII  |         the certain agreement or disagreement of two ideas immediately
133     IV,  XVII  |         the certain agreement or disagreement of any two ideas, by the
134     IV,  XVII  |       whose certain agreement or disagreement with them it does not perceive,
135     IV,  XVII  |         finding the agreement or disagreement of two ideas one with another,
136     IV,  XVIII |   perception of the agreement or disagreement of our own ideas: v.g. if
137     IV,  XVIII |   perception of the agreement or disagreement of our ideas, attained either
138     IV,  XVIII |   perception of the agreement or disagreement of any of our ideas, it
139     IV,  XX    |       perceives the agreement or disagreement of any two ideas.~If this