| Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | ||
| Alphabetical [« »] rudely 1 rudiments 1 ruin 1 rule 85 ruled 1 rulers 1 rules 71 | Frequency [« »] 86 did 85 infinity 85 law 85 rule 85 spirit 85 subject 84 consists | John Locke An essay concerning human understanding IntraText - Concordances rule |
Book, Chapter
1 Read | xxvii, concerning the third rule which men refer their actions 2 Read | vice” according to this rule of Reputation is all I have 3 Read | nature, which ought to be the rule of virtue and vice, were 4 Read | standing and unalterable rule by which they ought to judge 5 I, I | will be true to their own rule, and have assent at first 6 I, I | particulars into a general rule, must be innate. When yet 7 I, II | to instance any one moral rule which can pretend to so 8 I, II | there cannot any one moral rule be proposed whereof a man 9 I, II | should that most unshaken rule of morality and foundation 10 I, II | certainly a great and undeniable rule in morality. But yet, if 11 I, II | actions convince us that the rule of virtue is not their internal 12 I, II | But the breach of this rule cannot be a greater vice, 13 I, II | others, that it is no moral rule, nor obligatory, would be 14 I, II | and establishment of the rule be preserved.~8. Conscience 15 I, II | proof of any innate moral rule. To which I answer, that 16 I, II | morality to be named, or rule of virtue to be thought 17 I, II | is no argument that the rule is not known, because it 18 I, II | professedly disown and cast off a rule which they could not in 19 I, II | satisfy us that no practical rule which is anywhere universally, 20 I, II | generally allowed breach of a rule, proof that it is not innate. 21 I, II | innate. The breaking of a rule, say you, is no argument 22 I, II | say that this is an innate rule, what do you mean? Either 23 I, II | life the breach of this rule, and consequently that it 24 I, II | that whatever practical rule is in any place generally 25 I, II | confidently and serenely, break a rule which they could not but 26 I, II | be but a very uncertain rule of human practice, and serve 27 I, II | to God’s will, or to the rule prescribed by God—which 28 I, II | and so be as far from any rule or principle of his actions 29 I, II | being all one to have no rule, and one that will warp 30 I, II | God in his mind, to be the rule and touchstone of all other 31 II, I | make his own hypothesis the rule of nature, will find few 32 II, XXVII | the same, by the foregoing rule: and whilst they exist united 33 II, XXVII | different modes, the same rule holds. Whereby it will appear, 34 II, XXVIII| voluntary actions have to a rule to which they are referred, 35 II, XXVIII| utterly in vain to suppose a rule set to the free actions 36 II, XXVIII| intelligent being to set a rule to the actions of another, 37 II, XXVIII| punish deviation from his rule, by some good and evil, 38 II, XXVIII| revelation. That God has given a rule whereby men should govern 39 II, XXVIII| Secondly, the civil law—the rule set by the commonwealth 40 II, XXVIII| belong to it—is another rule to which men refer their 41 II, XXVIII| correspond with the unchangeable rule of right and wrong, which 42 II, XXVIII| nature, which ought to be the rule of virtue and vice, were 43 II, XXVIII| these rules. Whether the rule to which, as to a touchstone, 44 II, XXVIII| whether, I say, we take that rule from the fashion of the 45 II, XXVIII| agrees or disagrees with the rule; and so hath a notion of 46 II, XXVIII| conformity of any action to that rule: and therefore is often 47 II, XXVIII| called moral rectitude. This rule being nothing but a collection 48 II, XXVIII| invisible Lawgiver for my rule, then, as I supposed the 49 II, XXVIII| it to the civil law, the rule made by the legislative 50 II, XXVIII| whencesoever we take the rule of moral actions; or by 51 II, XXVIII| or disagreement with some rule that makes them to be regular 52 II, XXVIII| they are compared with a rule, and thereupon denominated, 53 II, XXVIII| the reference it has to a rule. By which confusion of these 54 II, XXVIII| action, disagreeing with the rule of right. And yet the private 55 II, XXVIII| relation to that supreme rule, it is no sin or transgression, 56 II, XXVIII| is the same, whether the rule any action is compared to 57 II, XXVIII| comparing the action with the rule, whether the rule be true 58 II, XXVIII| with the rule, whether the rule be true or false. For if 59 II, XXVIII| inquiry. For though the rule be erroneous, and I mistaken 60 II, XXVIII| Though, measuring by a wrong rule, I shall thereby be brought 61 II, XXVIII| that which is not the true rule: yet I am not mistaken in 62 II, XXVIII| that action bears to that rule I compare it to, which is 63 III, III | what gave occasion to the rule, that a definition must 64 III, III | necessity there is of such a rule, or advantage in the strict 65 III, III | those who have made this rule have done ill, that they 66 III, IV | definition, made according to rule, those who hear it have 67 III, IX | uniting them without any rule or pattern, it cannot be 68 III, IX | have scarce any standing rule to regulate themselves and 69 III, IX | common use, that is, the rule of propriety may be supposed 70 III, IX | different ideas. Besides, the rule and measure of propriety 71 III, IX | simple modes. By the same rule, the names of simple modes 72 III, XI | he makes it stand. This rule will not seem altogether 73 III, XI | being but a very uncertain rule, which reduces itself at 74 IV, I | without any such general rule. This then is the first 75 IV, V | truth of nothing by this rule, but of the visionary words 76 IV, VIII | lay down for an infallible rule, That, wherever the distinct 77 IV, XII | instance, or the general rule; and which it is that gives 78 IV, XII | the conduct of this one rule than by taking up principles, 79 IV, XVI | amiss to take notice of a rule observed in the law of England; 80 IV, XVI | beginning, come, by an inverted rule of probability, to pass 81 IV, XVI | discover, analogy is the great rule of probability. [Secondly], 82 IV, XVI | that are beneath man, the rule of analogy may make it probable, 83 IV, XVII | reducing our thoughts to any rule of syllogism. And therefore 84 IV, XVIII | but would prove a very ill rule for men to choose their 85 IV, XX | but the French, take this rule with one translation to