Book,  Chapter

 1   Read        |            either of the notion or proof of spirits. If any one take
 2      I,  I    |        reason,) would be as good a proof that they were innate, as
 3      I,  I    |       assent is in vain urged as a proof of them: if it be said that
 4      I,  I    |         that they are innate, is a proof of the contrary; since it
 5      I,  II   |          us.~4. Moral rules need a proof, ergo not innate. Another
 6      I,  II   |         needs be, and not need any proof to ascertain its truth,
 7      I,  II   |        with it, and needs no other proof: he that understands the
 8      I,  II   |       neither want nor receive any proof; but must needs (at least
 9      I,  II   |        preserved.~8. Conscience no proof of any innate moral rule.
10      I,  II   |             and if conscience be a proof of innate principles, contraries
11      I,  II   |          allowed breach of a rule, proof that it is not innate. The
12      I,  II   |           it anywhere, I say, is a proof that it is not innate. For
13      I,  II   |      thought not to need any other proof themselves. Whoever shall
14      I,  III  |            more than it would be a proof that there was no loadstone
15      I,  III  |            ignorance of Him, and a proof that they had no true notion
16     II,  I    |          begging it to bring, as a proof for it, an hypothesis, which
17     II,  I    |         and would need some better proof than bare assertion to make
18     II,  I    | self-evident proposition, it needs proof. I would be glad also to
19     II,  XIII |    Substance which we know not, no proof against space without body.
20     II,  XIII |         therefore need some better proof than a supposed matter of
21     II,  XIV  |  co-existent with our thinking.~4. Proof that its idea is got from
22     II,  XIV  |    considerable time together.~14. Proof. For trial, let him take
23     II,  XXI  |        daily complaints are a loud proof of this: the pain that any
24     II,  XXIII|     removal, one from another.~20. Proof of this. Every one finds
25     II,  XXXI |             is so far from needing proof that it will be thought
26    III,  III  |          that there needs no other proof of it but the considering
27    III,  V    |          of divers languages are a proof. A moderate skill in different
28    III,  X    |            what to answer: a plain proof, that, though they have
29     IV,  II   |        made out by a long train of proof.~7. Each step in demonstrated
30     IV,  II   |            idea which it uses as a proof: for if it were not so,
31     IV,  II   |          so, that yet would need a proof; since without the perception
32     IV,  VII  |    propositions which, without any proof, he assents to at first
33     IV,  VII  |            without the help of any proof, or reflection on either
34     IV,  VII  |          as with it, it needing no proof to make it perceived. Nor
35     IV,  VII  |            being known without any proof, do evince, That either
36     IV,  VII  |             nor are capable of any proof one from another; much less
37     IV,  VII  |      without hesitation or need of proof, or regarding those made
38     IV,  VII  |            need at all of them for proof, but such as are clear by
39     IV,  VII  |          maxims themselves without proof, if he cannot know the truth
40     IV,  VII  |            truth of others without proof, which are as self-evident
41     IV,  VII  |            requires nor admits any proof, one part of it more than
42     IV,  VII  |   certainty; and he that needs any proof to make him certain, and
43     IV,  VII  |           will also have need of a proof to make him admit, that
44     IV,  IX   |        needs nor is capable of any proof. For nothing can be more
45     IV,  X    |            and cannot want a clear proof of him, as long as we carry
46     IV,  X    |        perfect Being, not the sole proof of a God. How far the idea
47     IV,  X    |           different,) for the only proof of a Deity; and out of an
48     IV,  X    |          evident and incontestable proof of a Deity; and I believe
49     IV,  XV   |      probability of the thing; the proof being such as for the most
50     IV,  XVI  |     further removed the less their proof becomes. This is what concerns
51     IV,  XVI  |           copy of a record be good proof, yet the copy of a copy,
52     IV,  XVI  |          will not be admitted as a proof in judicature. This is so
53     IV,  XVI  |          truth, the less force and proof it has. The being and existence
54     IV,  XVI  |          knowledge of it is a good proof; but if another equally
55     IV,  XVI  |           weakens the force of the proof: and the more hands the
56     IV,  XVII |       observe the connexion of the proof, without reducing our thoughts
57     IV,  XVII |        admit what they allege as a proof, or to assign a better.
58     IV,  XIX  |    illumination without search and proof. Though the odd opinions
59     IV,  XIX  |           and of certainty without proof and without examination,
60     IV,  XIX  |         itself, and needs no other proof but its own evidence: they
61     IV,  XIX  |          he sees it? It is its own proof, and can have no other.
62     IV,  XIX  |          there is need of no other proof but that it is an inspiration
63     IV,  XIX  |          Firmness of persuasion no Proof that any proposition is
64     IV,  XIX  |       distinguished.~15. Belief no proof of revelation. If this internal
65     IV,  XIX  |           minds, without any other proof, a sufficient evidence that
66     IV,  XX   |         themselves, tending to the proof of any proposition; nor
67     IV,  XX   |          mankind, are as evident a proof as they are an unavoidable
68     IV,  XX   |       Scripture, are an undeniable proof of it. All that call themselves