Book,  Chapter

 1     II,  XXIII|     frame the complex idea of an immaterial spirit. And thus, by putting
 2     II,  XXIII|         perception and notion of immaterial substances as we have of
 3     II,  XXIII|           we have the idea of an immaterial spirit; and by putting together
 4     II,  XXIII|        ever could be, without an immaterial thinking being.~16. No idea
 5     II,  XXIII|      than they have belonging to immaterial spirit.~17. Cohesion of
 6     II,  XXIII|       draw a reason to show that immaterial spirits are not capable
 7     II,  XXIII|        God; not because he is an immaterial, but because he is an infinite
 8     II,  XXIII|           Our complex idea of an immaterial spirit and our complex idea
 9     II,  XXIII|           our complex idea of an immaterial spirit with our complex
10     II,  XXIII|          our idea of soul, as an immaterial spirit, is of a substance
11     II,  XXIII|          conceived as a thinking immaterial one, whatever difficulties
12     II,  XXIII|        Lastly, if this notion of immaterial spirit may have, perhaps,
13     II,  XXIII|     follow from the notion of an immaterial knowing substance.~32. We
14     II,  XXIII|     satisfied with our notion of immaterial spirit, as with our notion
15     II,  XXIII|     thing without solidity, i.e. immaterial, to exist, as a solid thing
16     II,  XXIII|       clearest, that of body, or immaterial spirit, this is evident,
17     II,  XXVII|        must, as well as the same immaterial spirit, go to the making
18     II,  XXVII|         constitution, void of an immaterial substance. For, whether
19     II,  XXVII|         who place thinking in an immaterial substance only, before they
20     II,  XXVII|       preserved in the change of immaterial substances, or variety of
21     II,  XXVII|         or variety of particular immaterial substances, as well as animal
22     II,  XXVII|         they will say, it is one immaterial spirit that makes the same
23     II,  XXVII|          in brutes, as it is one immaterial spirit that makes the same
24     II,  XXVII|    thinking substance (supposing immaterial substances only to think)
25     II,  XXVII| preserved.~14. Whether, the same immaterial substance remaining, there
26     II,  XXVII|       question, Whether the same immaterial substance remaining, there
27     II,  XXVII|        on this,—Whether the same immaterial being, being conscious of
28     II,  XXVII|        that he has in himself an immaterial spirit, which is that which
29     II,  XXVII|         them than if the soul or immaterial spirit that now informs
30     II,  XXVII|       part of this man; the same immaterial substance, without the same
31     II,  XXVII|      person. But though the same immaterial substance or soul does not
32     II,  XXVII|      same substance, material or immaterial, or no) that I was yesterday.
33     II,  XXVII|      either the same individual, immaterial, thinking substance; in
34     II,  XXVII|         without any regard to an immaterial soul.~Thirdly, or the same
35     II,  XXVII|       soul.~Thirdly, or the same immaterial spirit united to the same
36     II,  XXVII|         to the same and distinct immaterial substances, bringing it
37     II,  XXVII|       annexed to some individual immaterial substance or no. For, granting
38     II,  XXVII|          be necessarily supposed immaterial, it is evident that immaterial
39     II,  XXVII|   immaterial, it is evident that immaterial thinking thing may sometimes
40     II,  XXVII|        two persons with the same immaterial spirit, as much as in the
41     II,  XXVII|      will be in reference to any immaterial substance, which is void
42     II,  XXVII|       more myself than any other immaterial being. For, whatsoever any
43     II,  XXVII|     thought or done by any other immaterial being anywhere existing.~
44     II,  XXVII|     affection of, one individual immaterial substance.~But let men,
45     II,  XXVII|         the soul of a man for an immaterial substance, independent from
46     IV,  III  |          so disposed, a thinking immaterial substance: it being, in
47     IV,  III  |        that they should be in an immaterial substance, upon the motion
48     IV,  X    |          terms than material and immaterial.~10. Incogitative being
49     IV,  X    |          an eternal, cogitative, immaterial Being. This, though it take
50     IV,  X    |       one who allows an eternal, immaterial, thinking Being, but would
51     IV,  XVI  |         and operations of finite immaterial beings without us; as spirits,