Part, Paragraph

 1 Pre, 5 |  ascription of human affections to Deity, or the undue attribution
 2 Pre, 5 |           considered finite, while Deity is incomprehensible and
 3   I, 9 |           be imagined? But perhaps Deity has not been willing that
 4   I, 9 |       repugnant to the goodness of Deity to have created me subject
 5   I, 10|            which is here said of a Deity is fabulous: nevertheless,
 6   I, 12|            suppose, then, not that Deity, who is sovereignly good
 7 III, 4 |          ground for believing that Deity is deceitful, and as, indeed,
 8 III, 4 |           which the existence of a Deity of any kind is established,
 9 III, 27|          to the idea I have of the Deity, in whom there is no perfection
10 III, 33|           causes less perfect than Deity. This cannot be: for, as
11 III, 33|         perfections I attribute to Deity. Then it may again be inquired
12 III, 35|         perfections I attribute to Deity, and from another the idea
13 III, 35|           of all the properties of Deity, is one of the chief perfections
14 III, 35|          of all the perfections of Deity could certainly not be put
15  IV, 6 |         the impenetrable ] ends of Deity. ~
16  IV, 7 |         perfection of the works of Deity, but generally all his creatures
17  IV, 7 |     remarked the infinite power of Deity, I cannot deny that we may
18  IV, 8 |            no ground to prove that Deity ought to have endowed me
19  IV, 8 |            image and similitude of Deity. For although the faculty
20  IV, 15|         require the concurrence of Deity, because it is not a thing
21  IV, 15|           it is no imperfection in Deity that he has accorded to
22  IV, 15| nevertheless, that it was easy for Deity so to have constituted me
23  IV, 15|         perfect than I now am, had Deity created me superior to error;
24   V, 11|            entertain the notion of Deity, yet each time I happen