bold = Main text
   Sect.,  Part, Paragraph                             grey = Comment text

 1   I,    0, 5    |      subdividing and balancing of power; the lawyer more method
 2  II,    0, 13   |        not only escapes all human power and authority, but is not
 3  II,    0, 13   |           is any thing beyond the power of thought, except what
 4  II,    0, 13   |        and that all this creative power of the mind amounts to no
 5  IV,    I, 26   |     distinctly the action of that power, which produces any single
 6  IV,   II, 29   |           that wonderful force or power, which would carry on a
 7  IV,   II, 29(*)|                         The word, Power, is here used in a loose
 8   V,    I, 35   |           knowledge of the secret power by which the one object
 9   V,   II, 39   |          senses, it has unlimited power of mixing, compounding,
10   V,   II, 39   |       horse; but it is not in our power to believe that such an
11 VII,    I, 48   |      reflection; nor is it in our power to recal the original object,
12 VII,    I, 49   |          uncertain, than those of power, force, energy or necessary
13 VII,    I, 50   |       therefore, with the idea of power or necessary connexion,
14 VII,    I, 50   |         instance, to discover any power or necessary connexion;
15 VII,    I, 50   |           can suggest the idea of power or necessary connexion.~
16 VII,    I, 50   |      result from it. But were the power or energy of any cause discoverable
17 VII,    I, 50   |           qualities, discover any power or energy, or give us ground
18 VII,    I, 50   | uninterrupted succession; but the power of force, which actuates
19 VII,    I, 50   |       therefore, that the idea of power can be derived from the
20 VII,    I, 50   |          bodies ever discover any power, which can be the original
21 VII,    I, 50(*)|          Locke, in his chapter of power, says that, finding from
22 VII,    I, 50(*)|         there must somewhere be a power capable of producing them,
23 VII,    I, 50(*)|          reasoning at the idea of power. But no reasoning can ever
24 VII,    I, 51   |        senses, give us no idea of power or necessary connexion,
25 VII,    I, 51   |      moment conscious of internal power; while we feel, that, by
26 VII,    I, 51   |      Hence we acquire the idea of power or energy; and are certain,
27 VII,    I, 51   |           beings are possessed of power. This idea, then, is an
28 VII,    I, 52   |       from any apparent energy or power in the cause, which connects
29 VII,    I, 52   |    consciousness we perceived any power or energy in the will, we
30 VII,    I, 52   |           will, we must know this power; we must know its connexion
31 VII,    I, 52   |            were we conscious of a power in the former case, not
32 VII,    I, 52   |         fully acquainted with the power or force, by which it operates,
33 VII,    I, 52   |           is as much conscious of power to command such limbs, as
34 VII,    I, 52   |    perfect health is conscious of power to actuate any member which
35 VII,    I, 52   |          we ever conscious of any power. We learn the influence
36 VII,    I, 52   |           the immediate object of power in voluntary motion, is
37 VII,    I, 52   |           certain proof, that the power, by which this whole operation
38 VII,    I, 52   |     produced. But if the original power were felt, it must be known:
39 VII,    I, 52   |          must be known; since all power is relative to its effect.
40 VII,    I, 52   |          effect be not known, the power cannot be known nor felt.
41 VII,    I, 52   |          can we be conscious of a power to move our limbs, when
42 VII,    I, 52   |       limbs, when we have no such power; but only that to move certain
43 VII,    I, 52   |       assurance; that our idea of power is not copied from any sentiment
44 VII,    I, 52   |     sentiment or consciousness of power within ourselves, when we
45 VII,    I, 52   |           natural events: But the power or energy by which this
46 VII,    I, 52(*)|        force, and call up all our power, this gives us the idea
47 VII,    I, 52(*)|          us the idea of force and power. It is this nisus, or strong
48 VII,    I, 52(*)|          But, first, we attribute power to a vast number of objects,
49 VII,    I, 52(*)|          accurate precise idea of power, enters very much into that
50 VII,    I, 53   |        that we are conscious of a power or energy in our own minds,
51 VII,    I, 53   |     allowed, that, when we know a power, we know that very circumstance
52 VII,    I, 53   |          nothing: Which implies a power so great, that it may seem,
53 VII,    I, 53   |        must be owned, that such a power is not felt, nor known,
54 VII,    I, 53   |       operation is performed, the power by which it is produced,
55 VII,    I, 53   |       boundaries, or show why the power is deficient in one case,
56 VII,    I, 53   |     experience? Where then is the power, of which we pretend to
57 VII,    I, 53   |        unknown to us, renders the power or energy of the will equally
58 VII,    I, 53   |          in it like this creative power, by which it raises from
59 VII,    I, 55   |           every effect is not any power or force in nature, but
60 VII,    I, 55   |           totally ignorant of the power on which depends the mutual
61 VII,    I, 55   |          no less ignorant of that power on which depends the operation
62 VII,    I, 55   |  erroneously attribute to our own power and efficacy. Nor do philosophers
63 VII,    I, 56   |        that nothing possesses any power but by his concession: They
64 VII,    I, 56   |          created beings, of every power, in order to render their
65 VII,    I, 56   |  celebrate. It argues surely more power in the Deity to delegate
66 VII,    I, 56   |      delegate a certain degree of power to inferior creatures than
67 VII,    I, 57   |          or consciousness of this power in ourselves. We have no
68 VII,    I, 57(*)|        have any idea of the inert power; in the same manner as,
69 VII,    I, 57(*)|         comprehending that active power. It was never the meaning
70 VII,    I, 57(*)|           subordinate and derived power. By what means has it become
71  II,    0, 58   |     sought in vain for an idea of power or necessary connexion in
72  II,    0, 58   |           comprehend any force or power by which the cause operates,
73  II,    0, 58   |           no idea of connexion or power at all, and that these words
74  II,    0, 59   |      connexion between them; some power in the one, by which it
75  II,    0, 59   |         which we form the idea of power or necessary connexion.
76  II,    0, 60(*)|          definitions, the idea of power is relative as much as that
77  II,    0, 60(*)|      determined, we call that its power: And accordingly, it is
78  II,    0, 60(*)|      effect is the measure of the power. But if they had any idea
79  II,    0, 60(*)|           if they had any idea of power, as it is in itself, why
80  II,    0, 60   |          use of the words, Force, Power, Energy, &c., which every
81  II,    0, 61   |           can suggest any idea of power or necessary connexion.
82 VIII,    I, 70  |         no certain or determinate power to produce particular sentiments,
83 VIII,    I, 73  |          then, we can only mean a power of acting or not acting,
84 VIII,    I, 74  |            and means not any real power which has anywhere a being
85 VIII,   II, 81  |        hitherto to exceed all the power of philosophy. Happy, if
86  IX,    0, 94   |         of instinct or mechanical power, that acts in us unknown
87  XI,    0, 115  |    possess that precise degree of power, intelligence, and benevolence,
88  XI,    0, 116  |       cause, which controlled the power and benevolence of Jupiter,
89 XII,    I, 128  |          of argument, exceeds the power of all human capacity.~
90 XII,  III, 139  |          anything, but the strong power of natural instinct, could