bold = Main text
   Sect.,  Part, Paragraph                           grey = Comment text

 1  IV,    I, 21   |        fact, beyond the present testimony of our senses, or the records
 2   V,    I, 37   |         our inferences from one testimony to another, till we arrive
 3  II,    0, 60   |        removed from the present testimony of our memory and senses.
 4  IX,    0, 93   |  acquired a confidence in human testimony, books and conversation
 5   X,    I, 95   |        is founded merely in the testimony of the apostles, who were
 6   X,    I, 95   |        such confidence in their testimony, as in the immediate object
 7   X,    I, 97   |       which is derived from the testimony of men, and the reports
 8   X,    I, 97   |        of the veracity of human testimony, and of the usual conformity
 9   X,    I, 97   |        maxim in favour of human testimony, whose connexion with any
10   X,    I, 97   |       least confidence in human testimony. A man delirious, or noted
11   X,    I, 97   |        from witnesses and human testimony, is founded on past experience,
12   X,    I, 98   |      the opposition of contrary testimony; from the character or number
13   X,    I, 98   |       of their delivering their testimony; or from the union of all
14   X,    I, 98   |         when they deliver their testimony with hesitation, or on the
15   X,    I, 98   |    argument, derived from human testimony.~ Suppose, for instance,
16   X,    I, 98   |        that the fact, which the testimony endeavours to establish,
17   X,    I, 98   |    evidence, resulting from the testimony, admits of a diminution,
18   X,    I, 98   |      perceive a priori, between testimony and reality, but because
19   X,    I, 98   |      degree of assurance in the testimony of witnesses, gives us also,
20   X,    I, 98   |  naturally required very strong testimony to engage his assent to
21   X,    I, 98(*)|        requires a pretty strong testimony to render it credible to
22   X,    I, 99   |         probability against the testimony of witnesses, let us suppose,
23   X,    I, 99   |      and suppose also, that the testimony considered apart and in
24   X,    I, 100  |        our attention), "That no testimony is sufficient to establish
25   X,    I, 100  | establish a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind, that
26   X,    I, 100  |         If the falsehood of his testimony would be more miraculous,
27   X,   II, 101  |       we have supposed that the testimony, upon which a miracle is
28   X,   II, 101  |      that the falsehood of that testimony would be a real prodigy:
29   X,   II, 101  |         a full assurance in the testimony of men.~
30   X,   II, 102  |      which we might, from human testimony, have, in any kind of prodigy.
31   X,   II, 102  |         common sense; and human testimony, in these circumstances,
32   X,   II, 104  |     prodigies, that there is no testimony for any, even those which
33   X,   II, 104  |  miracle destroys the credit of testimony, but the testimony destroys
34   X,   II, 104  |    credit of testimony, but the testimony destroys itself. To make
35   X,   II, 104  |        have for our warrant the testimony of a few barbarous Arabians:
36   X,   II, 104  |          we are to regard their testimony in the same light as if
37   X,   II, 104  |        one, is destroyed by the testimony of two others, who affirm
38   X,   II, 105  |      seems to add weight to the testimony, and might be displayed
39   X,   II, 105  |      fact, and confirming their testimony, after the Flavian family
40   X,   II, 105  |        to which they gave their testimony. And what adds mightily
41   X,   II, 105  |      accurately to disprove the testimony, and to trace its falsehood,
42   X,   II, 105  |          supported by any human testimony, was more properly a subject
43   X,   II, 106  |        just, because some human testimony has the utmost force and
44   X,   II, 106  |     that therefore all kinds of testimony must, in all cases, have
45   X,   II, 106  |     must be drawn from the very testimony itself of the reporters:
46   X,   II, 107  |       then, it appears, that no testimony for any kind of miracle
47   X,   II, 107  |        gives authority to human testimony; and it is the same experience,
48   X,   II, 107  |       as a maxim, that no human testimony can have such force as to
49   X,   II, 108  |       admit of proof from human testimony; though, perhaps, it will
50   X,   II, 108  |       within the reach of human testimony, if that testimony be very
51   X,   II, 108  |        human testimony, if that testimony be very extensive and uniform.~
52   X,   II, 108  |       violation of truth in the testimony of men, with those of the
53   X,   II, 108  |    truth are more common in the testimony concerning religious miracles,
54   X,   II, 108  |         authority of the former testimony, and make us form a general
55   X,   II, 109  |  Christians, not as the word or testimony of God himself, but as the
56   X,   II, 109  |   corroborated by no concurring testimony, and resembling those fabulous
57   X,   II, 109  |       book, supported by such a testimony, would be more extraordinary
58 XII,   II, 136  |     fact, which lies beyond the testimony of sense or memory, is derived