bold = Main text
   Sect.,  Part, Paragraph                             grey = Comment text

 1  IV,    I, 22    |       Why? because these are the effects of the human make and fabric,
 2  IV,    I, 22    |         and light are collateral effects of fire, and the one effect
 3  IV,    I, 23    |    discover any of its causes or effects. Adam, though his rational
 4  IV,    I, 23    |        which produced it, or the effects which will arise from it;
 5  IV,    I, 24    |     proposition, that causes and effects are discoverable, not by
 6  IV,    I, 24    |          we could discover these effects by the mere operation of
 7  IV,    I, 25    |      there are always many other effects, which, to reason, must
 8  IV,    I, 26    |      resolve the many particular effects into a few general causes,
 9  IV,   II, 29    |          powers, and expect that effects, similar to those which
10  IV,   II, 29    |         be attended with similar effects. I shall allow, if you please,
11  IV,   II, 30    |       with different or contrary effects. May I not clearly and distinctly
12  IV,   II, 31    |         we are induced to expect effects similar to those which we
13  IV,   II, 31    |        similar we expect similar effects. This is the sum of all
14  IV,   II, 32    |     shows us a number of uniform effects, resulting from certain
15  IV,   II, 32    |       and consequently all their effects and influence, may change,
16  IV,   II, 33    |        objects, by observing the effects which result from them.
17  IV,   II, 33    |    future, and to expect similar effects from causes which are, to
18   V,    I, 36    |       which is well known by its effects. Perhaps we can push our
19   V,    I, 36    |       experience, therefore, are effects of custom, not of reasoning. *~
20   V,    I, 36(*) |        things, and examining the effects, that must follow from their
21   V,    I, 36    |          are supposed to be mere effects of reasoning and reflection,
22   V,   II, 42    |         kind, in considering the effects of contiguity as well as
23   V,   II, 43    |          considered as imperfect effects, and as connected with him
24   V,   II, 45    |           by which we infer like effects from like causes, and vice
25  VI,    0, 47    | supposition. But where different effects have been found to follow
26  VI,    0, 47    |       similar, all these various effects must occur to the mind in
27  VI,    0, 47    |      must not overlook the other effects, but must assign to each
28 VII,    I, 53    |          that such extraordinary effects do ever result from a simple
29 VII,    I, 57(*) |         gravity, we mean certain effects, without comprehending that
30  II,    0, 60(*) |         decided by comparing its effects in equal or unequal times;
31 VIII,    I, 67   |         conjoined to their usual effects with like uniformity. An
32 VIII,    I, 67   |       scrutiny, a contrariety of effects always betrays a contrariety
33 VIII,    I, 67   | connexion between all causes and effects is equally necessary, and
34 VIII,    I, 71   |      body, and the production of effects from their causes, we shall
35 VIII,    I, 71   |         a difference between the effects which result from material
36  IX,    0, 83    |          depths, &c., and of the effects which result from their
37  IX,    0, 83    |      still more evident from the effects of discipline and education
38  IX,    0, 84    |       life, as that of inferring effects from causes, be trusted
39   X,    I, 96    |        diligent observation. All effects follow not with like certainty
40   X,    I, 98    |         relations concerning the effects of frost, reasoned justly;
41   X,   II, 105   |     where talked of as the usual effects of that holy sepulchre.
42  XI,    0, 114   |        is an argument drawn from effects to causes. From the order
43  XI,    0, 114   |       capable of producing other effects, we can only indulge the
44  XI,    0, 114   |       the cause, and infer other effects from it, beyond those by
45  XI,    0, 115   |         cause; as if the present effects alone were not entirely
46  XI,    0, 116   |          drawing inferences from effects to causes, I still insist,
47  XI,    0, 116   |         and argue from causes to effects; presuming, that a more
48  XI,    0, 117   |   subject can only be drawn from effects to causes; and that every
49  XI,    0, 117   |          deducted from causes to effects, must of necessity be a
50  XI,    0, 122(*)|     known only by its particular effects, it must be impossible to
51  XI,    0, 122(*)|      impossible to infer any new effects from that cause; since the
52  XI,    0, 122(*)|   requisite to produce these new effects along with the former, must
53  XI,    0, 122(*)|  qualities. To say, that the new effects proceed only from a continuation
54  XI,    0, 122(*)|     already known from the first effects, will not remove the difficulty.
55  XI,    0, 122(*)|          be any traces of in the effects, from which all our knowledge
56  XI,    0, 122(*)|      from which new or different effects can be inferred.
57  XI,    0, 124   |         and resemblance to other effects and causes, which we know,
58 XII,  III, 141   |        the qualities, causes and effects of a whole species of objects