bold = Main text
   Sect.,  Part, Paragraph                                grey = Comment text

 1  IV,   II, 29    |           be drawn by reasoning and argument. What that medium is, I
 2  IV,   II, 29(*) |         additional evidence to this argument. See Sect. 7.
 3  IV,   II, 30    |                   30. This negative argument must certainly, in process
 4  IV,   II, 30    |             to conclude, because an argument escapes his enquiry, that
 5  IV,   II, 30    |             them can afford such an argument.~ All reasonings may be
 6  IV,   II, 30    |          false by any demonstrative argument or abstract reasoning a
 7  IV,   II, 30    |     mentioned. But that there is no argument of this kind, must appear,
 8  IV,   II, 32    |          recurs, on what process of argument this inference is founded?
 9  IV,   II, 32    |             alone, without some new argument or inference, proves not
10  IV,   II, 32    |         What logic, what process of argument secures you against this
11  IV,   II, 33    |           who concludes, because an argument has escaped his own investigation,
12  IV,   II, 33    |        conclusion by any process of argument or ratiocination, I may
13  IV,   II, 33    |         require you to produce that argument; nor have you any pretence
14  IV,   II, 33    |             You cannot say that the argument is abstruse, and may possibly
15  IV,   II, 33    |           any intricate or profound argument, you, in a manner, give
16  IV,   II, 33    |            I cannot now discover an argument which, it seems, was perfectly
17   V,    I, 34    |             is not supported by any argument or process of the understanding;
18   V,    I, 34    |          the mind be not engaged by argument to make this step, it must
19 VII,    I, 57    |         trust our common methods of argument, or to think that our usual
20  II,    0, 58    |             to a conclusion of this argument, which is already drawn
21 VIII,    I, 63   | entertainment. But the state of the argument here proposed may, perhaps,
22 VIII,    I, 65   |            use of a more convincing argument, than to prove, that the
23 VIII,    I, 69   |           But in order to throw the argument into a greater variety of
24 VIII,    I, 70   |          and form only one chain of argument, we shall make no scruple
25  IX,    0, 84    |           founded on any process of argument or reasoning, by which he
26   X,    I, 95    |            Tillotson's writings, an argument against the real presence,
27   X,    I, 95    |          elegant, and strong as any argument can possibly be supposed
28   X,    I, 95    |            convenient as a decisive argument of this kind, which must
29   X,    I, 95    |           that I have discovered an argument of a like nature, which,
30   X,    I, 97    |           that our assurance in any argument of this kind is derived
31   X,    I, 97    |           and mutual destruction of argument as in every other kind of
32   X,    I, 98    |            destroy the force of any argument, derived from human testimony.~
33   X,    I, 99    |           fact, is as entire as any argument from experience can possibly
34   X,   II, 104   |           miracle they relate. This argument may appear over subtile
35   X,   II, 105   |         large with all the force of argument and eloquence, if any one
36   X,   II, 105   |         subject of derision than of argument.~ There surely never was
37   X,   II, 110   |           employ any prophecy as an argument for a divine mission or
38  XI,    0, 111   |    traditional belief, more than of argument or disputation. After the
39  XI,    0, 113   |        examine the justness of this argument. I shall allow it to be
40  XI,    0, 114   |              that the chief or sole argument for a divine existence (
41  XI,    0, 114   |          You allow, that this is an argument drawn from effects to causes.
42  XI,    0, 115   |            to supply the defects of argument and reasoning. So far as
43  XI,    0, 116   |           liberty of conjecture and argument. But here you ought to rest.
44  XI,    0, 117   |           to causes; and that every argument, deducted from causes to
45  XI,    0, 121   |        without which this method of argument must be considered as fallacious
46  XI,    0, 122   |        unsupported by any reason or argument, can never be admitted but
47 XII,    I, 128   |             of clear and convincing argument, or even any appearance
48 XII,    I, 128   |           or even any appearance of argument, exceeds the power of all
49 XII,    I, 128   |            human capacity.~ By what argument can it be proved, that the
50 XII,    I, 130   |           never find any convincing argument from experience to prove,
51 XII,    I, 131(*)|                                This argument is drawn from Dr. Berkeley;
52 XII,   II, 133   |       sceptics to destroy reason by argument and ratiocination; yet is
53 XII,   II, 135   |           employing this species of argument, any popular objections,
54 XII,   II, 136   |           together; that we have no argument to convince us, that objects,
55 XII,  III, 138   |          idea of any counterpoising argument, they throw themselves precipitately