bold = Main text
   Sect.,  Part, Paragraph                             grey = Comment text

 1   I,    0, 1    |      nature, may be treated after two different manners; each
 2  II,    0, 12   |      perceptions of the mind into two classes or species, which
 3  II,    0, 13   |     golden mountain, we only join two consistent ideas, gold,
 4  II,    0, 14   |            14. To prove this, the two following arguments will,
 5 III,    0, 19(*)|  Causation and Resemblance. Where two objects are contrary, the
 6  IV,    I, 20   |         naturally be divided into two kinds, to wit, Relations
 7  IV,    I, 20   |        equal to the square of the two sides, is a proposition
 8  IV,    I, 24   |          arise from them. Present two smooth pieces of marble
 9  IV,   II, 29   |      wants to be explained. These two propositions are far from
10  IV,   II, 30   |    reasonings may be divided into two kinds, namely, demonstrative
11   V,    I, 36   |           constant conjunction of two objects - heat and flame,
12   V,    I, 38   |          many instances, that any two kinds of objects - flame
13   V,   II, 42   |        more nearly than when I am two hundred leagues distant;
14   V,   II, 43   |       same influence as the other two relations of resemblance
15  VI,    0, 46   |         or number of spots on the two remaining sides, it would
16 VII,    I, 56   |          this theory, perhaps the two following reflections may
17  II,    0, 59   |       impulse, as by the shock of two billiard balls, he could
18  II,    0, 60   |         effect in either of these two lights; but beyond these,
19  II,    0, 61   |      communicated by the shock of two billiard balls (to return
20 VIII,    I, 62  |       enquiries, in the course of two thousand years, been able
21 VIII,    I, 64  |           arise from the shock of two bodies in motion in any
22 VIII,    I, 64  |          in such a manner that no two events bore any resemblance
23 VIII,    I, 64  |    appearance of the other. These two circumstances form the whole
24 VIII,    I, 64  |         or hesitation, that these two circumstances take place
25 VIII,    I, 71  |            and finding that these two circumstances are universally
26 VIII,    I, 74  |      should be careful to observe two requisite circumstances;
27 VIII,   II, 75  |          Necessity may be defined two ways, conformably to the
28 VIII,   II, 75  |          ways, conformably to the two definitions of cause, of
29 VIII,   II, 78  |        This objection consists of two parts, which we shall examine
30   X,    I, 98   | observation, here is a contest of two opposite experiences; of
31   X,   II, 102  |          marriages; insomuch that two young persons of equal condition
32   X,   II, 104  |       supposes that the credit of two witnesses, maintaining a
33   X,   II, 104  |     destroyed by the testimony of two others, who affirm him to
34   X,   II, 104  |           affirm him to have been two hundred leagues distant,
35   X,   II, 105  |           us that he saw him with two legs. This miracle was vouched
36   X,   II, 107  |            When, therefore, these two kinds of experience are
37  XI,    0, 124  |      observation. It is only when two species of objects are found
38 XII,   II, 133  |           triangle to be equal to two right ones, though the latter
39 XII,   II, 136  |        this relation than that of two objects, which have been
40 XII,  III, 140  |          the squares of the other two sides, cannot be known,