bold = Main text
   Sect.,  Part, Paragraph                           grey = Comment text

 1   X,    I, 99   |      that of its antagonist.~ A miracle is a violation of the laws
 2   X,    I, 99   |       laws, the proof against a miracle, from the very nature of
 3   X,    I, 99   |      laws, or in other words, a miracle to prevent them? Nothing
 4   X,    I, 99   |     them? Nothing is esteemed a miracle, if it ever happen in the
 5   X,    I, 99   |      course of nature. It is no miracle that a man, seemingly in
 6   X,    I, 99   | observed to happen. But it is a miracle, that a dead man should
 7   X,    I, 99   |    against the existence of any miracle; nor can such a proof be
 8   X,    I, 99   |      proof be destroyed, or the miracle rendered credible, but by
 9   X,    I, 99(*)| circumstances, be denominated a miracle; because, in fact, it is
10   X,    I, 99(*)|        by accident, there is no miracle and no transgression of
11   X,    I, 99(*)|   removed, there is evidently a miracle, and a transgression of
12   X,    I, 99(*)|       have such an influence. A miracle may be accurately defined,
13   X,    I, 99(*)|         some invisible agent. A miracle may either be discoverable
14   X,    I, 99(*)|       into the air is a visible miracle. The raising of a feather,
15   X,    I, 99(*)|      that purpose, is as real a miracle, though not so sensible
16   X,    I, 100  |       sufficient to establish a miracle, unless the testimony be
17   X,    I, 100  |       happened. I weigh the one miracle against the other; and according
18   X,    I, 100  |       always reject the greater miracle. If the falsehood of his
19   X,   II, 101  |         testimony, upon which a miracle is founded, may possibly
20   X,   II, 101  |      found, in all history, any miracle attested by a sufficient
21   X,   II, 104  | witnesses; so that not only the miracle destroys the credit of testimony,
22   X,   II, 104  |         solid foundation. Every miracle, therefore, pretended to
23   X,   II, 104  |  reasoning, when we believe any miracle of Mahomet or his successors,
24   X,   II, 104  |  Catholic, who have related any miracle in their particular religion;
25   X,   II, 104  |        mentioned that Mahometan miracle, and had in express terms
26   X,   II, 104  |  certainty as they have for the miracle they relate. This argument
27   X,   II, 105  |        authority he related the miracle, of established character
28   X,   II, 105  |         him with two legs. This miracle was vouched by all the canons
29   X,   II, 105  |       thorough believers of the miracle. Here the relater was also
30   X,   II, 105  |         as of great genius; the miracle of so singular a nature
31   X,   II, 105  |     very face of it, and that a miracle, supported by any human
32   X,   II, 107  |       testimony for any kind of miracle has ever amounted to a probability,
33   X,   II, 107  |        such force as to prove a miracle, and make it a just foundation
34   X,   II, 108  |    remarked, when I say, that a miracle can never be proved, so
35   X,   II, 108  |        nature.~ But should this miracle be ascribed to any new system
36   X,   II, 108  |    Though the Being to whom the miracle is ascribed, be, in this
37   X,   II, 110  |        conscious of a continued miracle in his own person, which