bold = Main text
   Sect.,  Part, Paragraph                              grey = Comment text

 1   I,    0, 5     |      organ. Accuracy is, in every case, advantageous to beauty,
 2  II,    0, 15    |     conceiving these objects. The case is the same, if the object,
 3  IV,   II, 30    |    demonstrative arguments in the case seems evident; since it
 4  IV,   II, 31    |     course of experience. But the case is far otherwise. Nothing
 5   V,   II, 41    |      attain? This seems to be the case with that belief which arises
 6   V,   II, 41    |      cause and effect. And if the case be the same with the other
 7   V,   II, 41    |           common; and as in every case a resemblance and a present
 8   V,   II, 42    |       them. But as in this latter case, both the objects of the
 9  VI,    0, 47    |                           47. The case is the same with the probability
10 VII,    I, 52    |          of a power in the former case, not in the latter. We should
11 VII,    I, 52    |  particular limits. Being in that case fully acquainted with the
12 VII,    I, 52    |  Consequently, neither in the one case nor in the other, are we
13 VII,    I, 53    |         power is deficient in one case, not in another.~ Thirdly,
14 VII,    I, 55    |         ultimate principle in one case more than in the other.
15  II,    0, 59    |         Nothing farther is in the case. Contemplate the subject
16 VIII,    I, 63   |             63. This has been the case in the long disputed question
17 VIII,    I, 64   |          we should never, in that case, have attained the least
18 VIII,   II, 80   |                           80. The case is the same with moral as
19   X,    I, 96    |          observe, that, in such a case, he would have no cause
20   X,    I, 98    |          evidence, in the present case, may be derived from several
21   X,    I, 98    |           the marvellous; in that case, the evidence, resulting
22   X,    I, 98    |            gives us also, in this case, another degree of assurance
23   X,    I, 98(*) |   confessed, that, in the present case of freezing, the event follows
24   X,    I, 99    |          an entire proof; in that case, there is proof against
25   X,    I, 99(*) |          they are really, in this case, contrary to the laws of
26   X,    I, 100   |       establish; and even in that case there is a mutual destruction
27   X,   II, 101   |           a great deal to lose in case of their being detected
28   X,   II, 103   | mysterious or supernatural in the case, but that all proceeds from
29   X,   II, 103   |          seldom, is sometimes the case) it has a much better chance
30   X,   II, 108   |          is ascribed, be, in this case, Almighty, it does not,
31  XI,    0, 121   |     ascribe to him, being in that case derived from the production,
32  XI,    0, 121   |  reasoning. We comprehend in this case a hundred other experiences
33  XI,    0, 122   |                          113. The case is not the same with our
34  XI,    0, 122(*)|           granting this to be the case (which can seldom be supposed),
35 XII,  III, 140   |        definition. It is the same case with all those pretended
36 XII,  III, 141   |       which affirms it to be. The case is different with the sciences,