bold = Main text
   Sect.,  Part, Paragraph                                grey = Comment text

 1  II,    0, 14    |             this, the two following arguments will, I hope, be sufficient.
 2  IV,    I, 24    |         could ever be discovered by arguments a priori. In like manner,
 3  IV,   II, 30    |          there are no demonstrative arguments in the case seems evident;
 4  IV,   II, 30    |           be, therefore, engaged by arguments to put trust in past experience,
 5  IV,   II, 30    |             future judgement, these arguments must be probable only, or
 6  IV,   II, 30    | satisfactory. We have said that all arguments concerning existence are
 7  IV,   II, 30    |             supposition by probable arguments, or arguments regarding
 8  IV,   II, 30    |           by probable arguments, or arguments regarding existence, must
 9  IV,   II, 31    |                 31. In reality, all arguments from experience are founded
10  IV,   II, 32    |     impossible, therefore, that any arguments from experience can prove
11  IV,   II, 32    |             future; since all these arguments are founded on the supposition
12   V,    I, 36    |   superficial.~ If we examine those arguments, which, in any of the sciences
13  VI,    0, 45(*) |               Mr. Locke divides all arguments into demonstrative and probable.
14  VI,    0, 45(*) |             use, we ought to divide arguments into demonstrations, proofs,
15  VI,    0, 45(*) |              By proofs meaning such arguments from experience as leave
16 VII,    I, 53    |        accuracy? I believe the same arguments will prove, that even this
17 VII,    I, 57    |     operations. Though the chain of arguments which conduct to it were
18 VII,    I, 57    |           perceive any force in the arguments on which this theory is
19 VIII,    I, 62   |             all sides, in search of arguments which may give them the
20 VIII,   II, 77   |            prove, and from the same arguments, that liberty, according
21  IX,    0, 84    |             there be in reality any arguments of this nature, they surely
22   X,    I, 100   |             a mutual destruction of arguments, and the superior only gives
23   X,   II, 102   |           there is an opposition of arguments, we ought to give the preference
24  XI,    0, 112   |        capable of comprehending his arguments.~ The matter would not be
25 XII,    I, 126   |            make us enquire into the arguments, on which they may be founded.~
26 XII,    I, 126   |             are other more profound arguments against the senses, which
27 XII,    I, 129   |          shall be at a loss to find arguments, by which we may prove the
28 XII,    I, 131   |          deep, in order to discover arguments and reasonings, which can
29 XII,    I, 131(*)|     free-thinkers. But that all his arguments, though otherwise intended,
30 XII,   II, 136   |     assurance and conviction. These arguments might be displayed at greater
31 XII,  III, 141   |         being can only be proved by arguments from its cause or its effect;
32 XII,  III, 141   |            or its effect; and these arguments are founded entirely on