Sect.,  Part, Paragraph

 1  II,    0, 17 |        17. Here, therefore, is a proposition, which not only seems, in
 2  IV,    I, 20 |    square of the two sides, is a proposition which expresses a relation
 3  IV,    I, 21 |        is no less intelligible a proposition, and implies no more contradiction
 4  IV,    I, 23 |          to affirm, as a general proposition, which admits of no exception,
 5  IV,    I, 24 |                         24. This proposition, that causes and effects
 6  IV,   II, 29 |         you please, that the one proposition may justly be inferred from
 7  IV,   II, 30 |          discover any connecting proposition or intermediate step, which
 8  IV,   II, 30 |      there any more intelligible proposition than to affirm, that all
 9  IV,   II, 32 |       same. You say that the one proposition is an inference from the
10  IV,   II, 33 | appearance, similar. This is the proposition which I intended to enforce
11   V,    I, 36 |      advance a very intelligible proposition at least, if not a true
12 VII,    I, 48 |     reality, there is scarcely a proposition in Euclid so simple, as
13 VII,    I, 49 |          philosophy.~ It seems a proposition, which will not admit of
14 VII,    I, 49 |        to explain and prove this proposition, and have expressed my hopes,
15 XII,   II, 134|        perhaps, as absurd as any proposition, which can be formed. So
16 XII,  III, 140|       But to convince us of this proposition, that where there is no
17 XII,  III, 140|      violation of property. This proposition is, indeed, nothing but
18 XII,  III, 141|       idea as its existence. The proposition, which affirms it not to
19 XII,  III, 141|        properly so called. Every proposition, which is not true, is there
20 XII,  III, 141|       the half of 10, is a false proposition, and can never be distinctly
21 XII,  III, 141|          existed, may be a false proposition, but still is perfectly