bold = Main text
Chapter grey = Comment text
1 II | or the mention of some detail of costume, was the sex
2 III | and their multiplicity of detail, but because this delicacy
3 III | describe the procession in detail would needlessly tire the
4 V | the subordination of detail to the expression of a sensation
5 V(1)| accustomed to elaborated detail.
6 V | personality to humanity, of detail to feeling, which the miscomprehended
7 V | glance, not as studied in detail. We never see all the details
8 V | alone. To reproduce every detail would be to subordinate
9 V | peculiarity. A very minute detail is rarely brought out except
10 V | by the recognition of the detail; as, for example, when a
11 V | character, not the wearisome detail of masses; and yet the detail
12 V | detail of masses; and yet the detail is admirably suggested by
13 V | because of minuteness of detail. Detail in itself is not
14 V | of minuteness of detail. Detail in itself is not condemned
15 V | highest art is that in which detail is most exquisitely elaborated.
16 V | sharpest possible perfection of detail. And in the higher Japanese
17 V | in the Greek, the use of detail aids rather than opposes
18 V | illustration is not multiplicity of detail, but, as we shall presently
19 V | presently see, signification of detail.~ The queerest fact about
20 V | p. 115}~physiognomical detail in Japanese art is that
21 IX | all, even to the tiniest detail of tone or line, have been
|